Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/191/2015 • CJ GE ATA/191/2015 Généré par l'IA

Trade Mark Opposition Based on Likelihood of Confusion

Numéro de cause ATA/191/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a decision regarding the registration of a trade mark that was challenged on the basis of its similarity to an earlier mark, with the appellant arguing that the similarity in the visual and phonetic elements of the marks, despite differences in the meaning of the goods they cover, was sufficient to cause confusion among the relevant public. The court determined that the earlier mark was well-known and that the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks were significant, leading to a likelihood of confusion in the marketplace, and therefore upheld the initial refusal to register the contested mark.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Trade Mark Opposition Based on Likelihood of Confusion: The court determined that the earlier mark was well-known and that the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks were significant, leading to a likelihood of confusion in the marketplace, and therefore upheld the initial refusal to register the contested mark.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
marques similitude entre les marques opposition à la marque risque de confusion marque olfactive étiquetage et mise sur le marché
Généré par l'IA
A/2189/2013
Trademark Registration Dispute Based on Likelihood of Confusion
C/5465/2016
Trademark Infringement Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Likelihood of Confusion
C/20187/2018
Trademark Infringement Preliminary Injunction Denied Due to Lack of Confusion Risk
C/25954/2013
Trademark and Trade Name Infringement Dispute
C/20173/2018
Trademark Infringement Suit Dismissed Due to Lack of Likelihood of Confusion

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/53/2015

### [ATA/191/2015](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887478) du 19.02.2015 ( AIDSO ) , INCOMPETENT

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2015/0001/ATA_000191_2015_A_53_2015.pdf)

* /