Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/184/2014 • CJ GE ATA/184/2014 Généré par l'IA

Property Lien Validity Challenge Regarding Time-Barred Enforcement Action

Numéro de cause ATA/184/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a decision concerning the validity of a lien registered against their property, specifically arguing that the registration of a final enforceable claim, which was based on a secured debt, was time-barred because the original action to enforce the debt had prescribed before the final registration. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the action for the enforcement of the secured claim itself had not prescribed, and that the applicable procedural law governed the final registration of the existing enforceable title, meaning the final registration was validly performed within the legal timeframe following the initial recognition of the debt.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Property Lien Validity Challenge Regarding Time-Barred Enforcement Action: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the action for the enforcement of the secured claim itself had not prescribed, and that the applicable procedural law governed the final registration of the existing enforceable title, meaning the final registration was validly performed within the legal timeframe following the initial recognition of the debt.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la poursuite inscription d'une hypothèque légale titre exécutoire reconnaissance et exécution validité de la résiliation de bail action en constatation
Généré par l'IA
A/4378/2006
Enforcement Order Validity and Time-Barred Debt Defense
A/339/2005
Lien Enforcement Validity Challenge
A/1686/2002
Lien Validity Upon Judgment Revival
A/4039/2006
Lien Enforcement Validity Due to Defective Notice
A/321/2017
Creditor v. Enforcement Office Regarding Untimely Lien Validation Request

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/270/2013

### [ATA/184/2014](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1886580) du 25.03.2014 sur JTAPI/505/2013 ( LCR ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2014/0001/ATA_000184_2014_A_270_2013.pdf)

* /