Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/179/2005 • CJ GE ATA/179/2005 Généré par l'IA

Royalty Calculation Dispute and Contract Interpretation

Numéro de cause ATA/179/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought review of a decision concerning the calculation of royalties under an agreement, specifically challenging the application of certain discount factors and the interpretation of contract language regarding overhead and administrative expenses. The court reasoned that the contract language explicitly authorized the specified deductions, and the established record demonstrated that the opposing party consistently applied these terms in a manner consistent with their current position, thereby supporting the lower court's finding that the calculation method was contractually sound and that the prior inconsistent application by the petitioner did not constitute an error warranting relief.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

ALLOCATION DE LOGEMENT; LOCATAIRE; PRINCIPE DE LA BONNE FOI | Refus de la DL de verser rétroactivement l'allocation de logement. Demande incomplète (art. 25 al 1 ; 26 al 1 et 28 al 2 RGL). | LGL.39A; RLGL.25 al.1; RLGL.26 al.1; RLGL.28 al.2

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat contrat d'enregistrement mode de calcul contrat d'affacturage calcul des droits acquis règlement du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/212/2004
Royalty Calculation Dispute Based on Contractual Deduction Interpretation
A/1047/2005
Contract Royalty Calculation Dispute
A/4379/2005
Contractual Royalty Calculation Dispute
A/3092/2005
Contract Interpretation Dispute Over Royalty Calculation Base
A/2362/2007
Royalty Calculation Contract Interpretation Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

         

 

   

   







!"##########    $%&"'##########



 ( '')    





     !"# 

 

$(  )* ++++++++++  ), ++++++++++ -, ./0  , 1 .2 3  4, 5++++++++++2  ..*  6 .,/  '/*789,::3,7-;)1,7++++++++++2$!&</32   =  97/3 > ;? $@A#'B( 2 C8  88  *.,(  .D,3  ,  8* *  ;? '&&(  .,  $ 3*:!&&!(

!(  7,,!$*!&&<2944,8*23 *.  ,,  8* -, ./0  12  *, 9,  8*..7,$3,!&&<<$*!&&'(

<(   !! *, !&&<2 , >  8*,  =2    7 E ,2>,E.,2, ;?'&&( $F,!&&<<$ * !&&'2  .7, 6  3*   ,  , . * ,6(,773,.7*C./,,, .,:.8**,E.7>,,4,,/ 9,,./78,.287,:,,/*,,. 3,*8*(

'( (  $@ F3, !&&'2  ,  ,,7  3*   ,2*$#F3,!&&'2,,,67 ,*:*3*.7,(

 :(  !< F3, !&&'    6,  ,  .,/ *.7* ,2  ,  ,   4, 69  .3, . .  7,,   : 9 , ,*.(    77 ,3,7 > .,0

 7*.,9CG*8.)*++++++++++ ,4,*69.3,..,,H

 F,4,,497)*++++++++++2,,, ,7*7,H

  7,,  9;., 877 *,  *  9, *2,C8*9*.,)(++++++++++H

  7*.  ,*,7 F,/  CG*82 ,  C8* 9*.,)(++++++++++

"$%%!"!&&' <"# 

  , *,  *   : "  , 97 37 > )* ++++++++++ 2 > 742  F,4,,4 * 4,*699C,.(

 ( ,*,.,/6,$F,!&&'(

@(   7,,  $# F, !&&'    47 E ,  3*9,2*,46,,9,<I  , 877   8*   .,  ,  $ F3, $I%B -J'&@197,.*.,( .,,27*C69,3, ., . 3  8* *,E .7 >  ,, 4,,/ 7,,3(

#(  5, >  7*, 737 .  ,  !$ F, !&&'2      7,,  7*,  $< K !&&'  2 > , E.,2,8*$K!&&'<$*!&&@(  .2,3,7>CC..**,7E(

%(     !' K !&&'2  ,  ,,  ,: *,,,4 9     3* 7,4  9, .  *, 93,!&&'>F,*L*7(3,7.7**. ,2 ,  F3, !&&'2  9, 3, 7 > *:  .,/ 6, .  2 97,  ,  *6 9,4*,  . 69, *, 78,>CC*.,(

B(  9..7':!&&'(

   , 3, 7.7  * 9, ,*./  $@ F3, !&&'( 9,7  3, ,3,7 . E 4, >  *.7    ,4  4, 69 7,,  .3, L ., 69> 7.,  , *.( )87  *,  82 , 93, . .,  * 6,  *. ,( 4,2 , 9,36,    4 *F .3 F,4,  (  762 97, > F , 6 9,3,.,44$K!&&'2,.*,F*,,3 7.,  * ,,7    .3, . L 37 7,3*(

I(  56,27787>F8(

' 

$(  F7  *. , 3  F,,, *.72    3:-(@# ,A8,,F,,,!!3*:$I'$ 

"$%%!"!&&' '"# 

  !&@H(#<($,(, .7*,,,3$! .*:$IB@    @$&1(

!(  ,.L*,:774,9,8*, =,C8*,4*.278>3> 42,7C838**,7E.7, ,37,*F-(<I ($1(

<(  39,!@,7$/8*9E7,,877 8*.,,!'K$II!-J'&@(&$12  , 6, 7, L *,  :774,  9,  8* ,   6L 7,  3, *.72 *.87    *7,>*(3,*.737,4,,,,    6L  ,4,  7,,    F ,3  7.,,*.-(!#$1(

  9,.44 .*,F*, ,37,,  37**-(!B!1(

 :( 7,3*. ,2,9E.,3>  3*- ?$$!:$<<M $IBB'%@1( 2.,,.  : 4, E,8  9*,,7 69, 4,  ,4*, E  *./.*>9*,,,.7,,3:E -(N 27,,*,,,42;:,8,CCC$II$2.(!<&( $&!#1(

'(  9./2,=,9E*,,7,,, 9,9,..7,6,(

  77K*,4*76.777,,7.=, 44F,,6..7,7*,72,$F,!&&<<$ * !&&'2  6  3* 97, . *,6( 2 , 9 . .,*6,3$F,!&&'2*L*6 3,3,>E.,*,69.3,7,, :9,,*.( ,:*,,,4,769, .3.73,*679,4*,(

  .24,6,7.=778,. 3  *., .G 6 . 7. E *     , F,4,   , ,  *,4 9E - "@I!"!&&&  !# .*:!&&&1(

  7629>F,6,>9,97:76  $ K!&&'2,.*,F*,,37.,* ,,7.,7,,( E,.*,93,!&&'

"$%%!"!&&' @"# 

>F,!&&'29.>L377,3*2, >.3,97,*.*.7(

@(  )47F7

#(  5 9, $&   4,2 7**  ,*,7  .7 *,,,3<&F,$IB#- @$&(&<12.79.8,(  762 3 9,  ,,82  7**  ;? <&&(   *, >  C826,*:(

( ' *     

+ ,$!"-

7 3:   ,F7  !' K !&&' . )* ++++++++++  ), ++++++++++   7,,   ,,  8*  $< K !&&'H

,$%-

FH

*>C87** ;?<&&( H

,6  .7 L > )* ++++++++++  > ), ++++++++++ ,,6A>,,8*(

5,780 )*3=2.7,2)(=C/2)*;,2)( C7,2)*2 F8(

* ,:*,,,40

844,/ F,F(0  3, .7,0     )( , (3=   

"$%%!"!&&' #"# 

.,4*L77,67E.,(

 /32  844,/0           

"$%%!"!&&'