Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/173/2006 • CJ GE ATA/173/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Breach and Damages Award

Numéro de cause ATA/173/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a contractual matter concerning the provision of certain services, where one party alleged that the other failed to fulfill its obligations under the agreement, leading to an alleged breach and subsequent damages. The court determined that the specific language of the contract clearly delineated the responsibilities of each party and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure by the breaching party to adhere to these established terms, thereby justifying the claim for relief sought by the injured party.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Breach and Damages Award: The court determined that the specific language of the contract clearly delineated the responsibilities of each party and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure by the breaching party to adhere to these established terms, thereby justifying the claim for relief sought by the injured party.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels prestation de services objet du litige manquement au devoir qualification du contrat défaut de la chose

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the final order regarding the costs of the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/3341/2005
Contractual Breach and Damages Award
A/1661/2003
Contractual Breach and Damages Award
A/377/2007
Contract Breach and Damages Award
A/4108/2006
Contract Breach and Damages Award
A/223/2004
Commercial Contract Breach and Damages Award

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the final order regarding the costs of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



         

 !"

"!#"!#"$!%&'"'%((#))#" 





  #*  !" "#$%& 

& 

   +                



     '()*'

   & " .   (- /%" (--+  !0 111111111 &   ""&%" &2% &%0 "&"0 "3"' 456  7(8.%"(--+/ &"%%0 % &  4  9 /%" (--+$  0& "/ :; "  &0&0" ; "& 

6  $ & 00   /&"  %&& "0   "<0  "=  & "&0   $   ""$      &0   ;="    "&            " "%  6    >" ? ;"  "&  >/""""&"0 "@

 %:" ""& = &"&&>  &@

 %  &"& > "   &"   & $   ?   "  "&;// "/@

 % 0" "&6  9A0(--+& . :B    :;%"? C&:;"  "&0&%""&$ &C">."&  0 "4@

&" 5

 :&2 "++"0"&"&0""  "%9(  0>9D,A3 ' A9-7$&// "/?0&":2 &" :"" ""& :2" &&2= "&&&>  &@

 :  ;4@

 : & 2" (   0B0 "&" "&$  "> 0""  "/    "  2//  "/ ?  0    " &   " B  &  <%0  0 &:2" B >"& 2E&&@

 :2? 2 "(9"0" $2 &"  2&//"&:B  &&0&%""&="< >&"F @

 :0& &&" 2"2<" 2 &" &<"& 2."" "&0""  "%3 G(9G( 7@

 :   "&" "&   "    " <   &"   & 0""  "%$&C" $&?2 >"0 /" @

 ::B % B . $"2E" 0"24">  "  0 &%""&    '?   :"   " ? 2 >"0 /" @

 :  &  0  "   "> 0""  "/ 2&& ? 2" "0& "?"%"%"&"0 "@

)+*,)(--+ '*)*'

 :2  :B  2  & &>.  2& &"  2//  "/$ 0" %"  ? :"."" "&""2&&0&%""&  ?& " 6  ?<" ?E$C $  "&""@

 :   0  %""    0" "  2    /"  & ?  %<2" B &0&0"$" ; &" " "0 &%>"" 2   0"& @

 :2" 4&&C">."3 H9(**D&"G*G 89@ H99DA-*&"G( *GA-A'A-+@&&GG H (,."9DDA G@ )I(A)(--A(A& &>(--A /" 7@

 :; &:$  0  0 &%""&   &   . G

 !,#"%-'."          

. 00&%""&@

%& /" .:;?&" .</&@

&00": ""&$&"$?!" "#$%& &  "":2%" &2% &%0 "&"0 "G

  %"'"  ">0""  "/5     G&%E 

&"&/&0 ""& &00":= "G

 4%$  <//"45         

)+*,)(--+