Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/171/2005 • CJ GE ATA/171/2005 Généré par l'IA

Arbitration Clause Interpretation Limiting Scope

Numéro de cause ATA/171/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought to enforce a statutory right to arbitration for a dispute concerning the terms of an agreement, arguing that the dispute fell within the scope of the arbitration clause based on the clear language of the contract. The court reasoned that while the right to arbitrate is generally favored, the specific clause in question contained limiting language restricting its application only to claims involving the interpretation or enforcement of specific enumerated sections of the agreement, and the current dispute did not fall within those specifically enumerated sections; therefore, the court denied the motion to compel arbitration because the broad language relied upon by the moving party was superseded by the more restrictive language specifying the covered disputes.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitration Clause Interpretation Limiting Scope: The court reasoned that while the right to arbitrate is generally favored, the specific clause in question contained limiting language restricting its application only to claims involving the interpretation or enforcement of specific enumerated sections of the agreement, and the current dispute did not fall within those specifically enumerated sections; therefore, the court denied the motion to compel arbitration because the broad language relied upon by the moving party was superseded by the more restrictive language specifying the covered disputes.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
clause compromissoire limites légales partie au contrat exécution créance contestée obligation de non-concurrence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/3501/2006
Arbitration Award Interpretation Within Scope of Authority
A/13/2007
Arbitration Clause Validity and Scope Dispute
A/1492/2003
Contractual Choice of Law vs. Arbitration Clause Interpretation
A/4499/2006
Contractual Rights Enforcement Limitation Dispute
A/1860/2005
Arbitration Clause Enforceability Based on Unconscionability Claim

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

            

 !

  





  "  #$

 %&&'(#  !"#  $%" &'" 

" 

   )*      !"( $')&'" 





     *+,-*

  

/0  +123+..4&5" 3"6! "3 73*89:" 3"; %3   53 < '3 ::33  '3 < <":: %3= " < 3% 3" < >$  '3&  "  3'& ">3 ? <"  ,!  ?<"3  ">$%3+-"'>% /@@4 7 ! *  A .-;&  '    3"  '3 3 ?  "  3"&  B"3$3  &"3   $3=&"2 C   D0

+0  E'3B * "33 &= "   "" ""  """>""3 !3E?  E>3&"B%F 3 73*89"""" ;0

G0  /H:'3+..-& 3 :" 3"3>>"%338"3 %3 73*89   3 ;& B3   ">   "  ">    :" 3"&  ">>3=I" =>$'3  2B? 3   ="::<'3  2B"B >38 ">3: I 8B> &$3$B "<23 30

  J3 3 I %<' 3"> 3" ">   3    :3  #  =   =  ":: ">3 ? ' 3"& "3 <'3     2B0  "  < 3  33= " <":: 0

40   G>+..-&""""  33"8 3%>33  3:0"%> ?<" "3<:: 3: " 33> ?< 3"33" '"3<::3? :" 3" " "' 33"0  % &  "   3B3  <'3" 3"33"::3&  <B3   3 >  ":: &<'3" 3"<3 3 3"<%3 3  33"" 3"3 &33=<%"'"3<3 3"0

-0  '3 ? >3:: 3:&:" 3"<K ""0 "2 " >33 >3: > "3 3":3I" "'"3L  0 '3 "? "?<23 3">$   "  =<  "'3    '"3 < 3 L  " ? <>33""0 3<33 3>:3%3:"0 " <3 3>"'3 '"3<3 L %3" ?"'"3 "  "   '   & "3  < 3"   "  3" < 3>>% 6!0  "  <B3   =  ?  <3 L  3' " 0

,-.+,+..- *G,-*

   

/0   2  > 3' 233 3"">  &">%* 3>:3*'%"3 '7 0/-<"3  " >$%3+-"'>%/@@47 !*A.-;& 0G0/ +3 0 "3 "3  "3M  ?$?M"3  ">$ %3/+23/@@H7 !*A0.-0.;;0

+0  "MM:: 3:IB7 0/H0/ !;0

  " :"3& M "3   "  & M"::3 "  >& " M:: 3:&"  =3*33::3>> :" =M 3 L  %3 " 3' "   MK "" 7 0 /H 0 + !;&   :"> 3" M33     M 3 AA 3 +   "3   " >33  3'/+ >%/@1-7 * -/.N ,-@A,+..4/-23  +..4 :3 ;0

  " 3>  ?  33 B>  %3  %3  "3  %3&  B3   : M" M::  3:  "> 3=  "& :3  3  ">33"3 '3 M 33  " ">> >"K  3"0 8 " =  B3   3B   I3"  33&  I 3" ?  3*3 "3'  M3    3 3'>  7 ,@.,+..4  /@ 2'3+..4 :3 ;0

  E3 M::  3: M    3 &  "     L  " 8 MI3 3"3"7 0/4 !;0

G0  E"  23& 3 K  3 M::       3 L  %3 3'20"3' &" &L 3"3 3"$  8   "0   I>  " %   : M::  3: I " >3: >  "'  $  8 750 O& M::  3:    > "'33"  " >33  3' 3  5 /@HA 0 ++4 N  5 /@@1  0 4/ N ,-@A,+..4 3     : 3 0;0

40   MB3  "   >3 3  3 L  %3 " 3' "  M""? 3  3"M:: 3:0

 0 M3 L  %3 ?  3 3"  "2  '3   ""& "3   %P 3> "B> "3I&  30

 M3 L %3 33M3% 3""3  L '0

  3"3 3"3   M !" >> "3'  % 0

,-.+,+..- *4,-*

   I 3 L  %3 B3 3> '     ":3  ">>  M8&=M3L =3:3" 7 ,-.G,+..4+ 23+..4 :3 ;0

 %0 M3 L 3' >3 333" = B>   30

 0 =3"M3 L 3'" & 3%>33  3:  3 = M'  >33"  " M3   3>  " ::  3%>$M "3 33   "" 3  7 0/A0/ + !;0" " <3?  23 3"0

 0 '=38&  >< 3:: 3 L  > 3"&  '3*3   3% >33  3: :   3  <:: 3:"0

-0  " " 3 L >"3*3  "  B>  3"?>" 3' 3"< > "::&"3 "   >3:   $3  $B    8B>  33 =  " "<23 30 3 3= 3 $3$B&8B>   "&=<<" :3 >"> 0"<# 33 <>%::3>> :"0

A0     <3  3" %=  "  ""   2B B ? <3  3""

H0  " :32 3'2=M?"3 2B:"0

         

: 3 <:: 3:"N

'" :32 32=M?"3 2B:"N

">>3=    33"&  "3& ? ! "#  $%" & '"   " &33=M?!"( $')&'" 5" 3"6! "3 0

  '3*3  3%>33  3:9     0"'K

,-.+,+..- *-,-* 

"3":"> 33" ">>3=I 30

 8'&  B::389           

,-.+,+..-