Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/170/2006 • CJ GE ATA/170/2006 Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract Regarding Payment Term Extension Lacking Consideration

Numéro de cause ATA/170/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a contractual agreement where the initial payment term was valid until a specific date, but an amendment attempted to extend this period without clear consideration or adherence to formal requirements, leading to a claim for breach of contract. The court determined that the attempted amendment was unenforceable because it lacked the essential element of new consideration to support the purported extension of the initial agreement's terms, thus affirming the validity and enforcement of the original payment schedule.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Breach of Contract Regarding Payment Term Extension Lacking Consideration: The court determined that the attempted amendment was unenforceable because it lacked the essential element of new consideration to support the purported extension of the initial agreement's terms, thus affirming the validity and enforcement of the original payment schedule.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contre-prestation contractuelle clause abusive modification de la demande indu demande tardive de prolongation décision d'extension

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was applied to rule on the costs of the federal recourse procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/637/2006
Contract Modification Lacking Consideration
A/1253/1999
Contractual Extension Validity Dispute
A/2339/2005
Breach of Contract Claim Fails Due to Indefinite Terms
A/38/2007
Contract Modification Validity Based on Lack of Consideration
A/1256/2006
Contract Amendment Validity and Consideration Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was applied to rule on the costs of the federal recourse procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

  

    

 

  !"#$%





$%# &'''''''''' 



( ) (( ** (( ( )& * 





     !"# 

( 

'(  )  '*+!, -. ////////// 0. 123 -(/////////   4,5...)6 .,..615..1.' 157!&&&,).8)1.)1)8.(

!(     .  8.  57.    8.9. 0.

123: 6.)..5)4,-(//////////616)) 5.2...2(

;(   '% 157 !&&#,  < -(////////// ..   =.  ..  9, . >>  >.9 69 >. 6)8. 69. . 1  5 <. 6). ?) 1 . 1  91 6>(    5@8, -(////////// A  5 <.  1)).(

$(  .111.,: .8.'%857!&&#6.))B >.9.6?(

#(  :)1-(/////////,: ).,'!)57!&&#, .C.15..D1).5.11.. 6.'%.)15..>))...2 '!)57'*#+0:E$'(&'  4(56).15..55 )9(  B    8  )..,  >. 5. 6 ....:.(

%(  5.B61.CDBF,!+ )57 !&&#, -(////////    ).. 1).)(  ..8.55.6.>.<..).1A)5.6). C)D8<.).G9)16.)..5)(

  8.8)5.85751.B1.51,<.67.9. BB.8.:.5B.FB.>.1 5.(:15..,.1.18.(:519). .  . 8.  . B .>>) H 8, 55 AH  5).(    8=. 1 55 . 1. C. B 8.8D 1.5.C.D(

E(    ; >)8. !&&% 1  .7  ),  1.  >.  )..83

  ( -(////////// 8. )) 99) 1  1. .8   5.  55  9 6.  .>>(  8.   55BAI,J51=8...<612

"$%&&"!&&# ;"# 

.9.(:>.K'5!&&%,5.519 ).)GB?8.(

  68.L81)1),5.6.1 6..<..).1A)(

  7(  1)  :   F1) <  >   8. )) .)) 55 98,  .  6..    1  5K. 18<) 1  >.9 69,   B 611A 6 19 1 1.)(

  .7)).!$>)8.!&&%B-(/////////1 )5.   .   1)(  6)A),   . 9) B G9(

+(  -(////////// 6 1 >. 9   >)   ). <. . 8.)))(

( * 

'(  G)  51 . 8  G... 51),    870(#% .M9..G...!!857'*$'    !&#N(%;('(.1)5...8'! 157'*+#    #'&4(

!(   11..  . !% .) !  ;; .) !  ,  1 1..26.51 B6)9>,5?5<68191 1.)( B6.;'.)15. ,.1.<. 555K8)A.>LB18.>5F 8.1(

   612,     1 8. 1)) B  >.9 69, <. . >. 1  5K.   8)A., . B 1F.5.) 6 1911.)<6916>8.A)<6 5=.6).?)1)19(

  551>.,.6=1.1 1.1)55)11)(

;(  6.'%.)15. ,>98 8..29..,<.5).59).) 6..<59(

  :  G.1   .7  ),  1  5K. >980 "''&"!&&#'5!&&# "#%!"!&&$!%G.

"$%&&"!&&# $"# 

!&&$..<?.)4(K,6.>. B 998  )   5 5..   G.1  )95 0 "%E$"!&&#  '' 7 !&&#  "E%*"!&&$  # 7 !&&$..<?.)4(

  =..)<55..>.98 .1..1).)(

$(  :6.'%.)!  ,).15.  .5..55.5.>98(

   612, 6.) ..5) 6    5..55 )9,   <6.6=1..7.1>.(

#(  :69.65A..615.)9, ...  .  :. 1 ? 1) 0($# ('  6 )9 M5..  1   8)A. B  .. .2!E7'*E%O  :E$'(#'P4(

%(  - >),   . ? G)( : , <. 57,  5)F>.1)?)612B QR$&&( 0(+E 4( SSSSS

+  (*  (    

,-.$ /

)87.G)!+)57!&&#1-.////////// )..8.57.8.9.'!)57!&&# ...>.915..)9:.1. 5.N

.$%/

GN

5BA9)55 QR$&&( N

. <, >5)5 F . *E  .8   . >)) M9.. G...,1)?1?1),18..5...>,   G 2  .>.., 1 8  .7 >))N  5)5.  ...<.,5.>5=181.9 5.N..?).F51.5.

"$%&&"!&&# #"# 

.7 >)), '&&&  '$N  1) ?   1.2  1.  ,.8<)555=18,.8?G.BM8.N

55.<  1) ? B -. ////////// .. <M 8.  57.8.9.BM>>.>))B(

:.)93 -58=,1).,--(=A2, A).,G9(

5 .75...>3

9>>.2 G.3  8. 1).3     (. :.9. (8=   

1.>5?))55.<)F1.(

 28,  9>>.23           

"$%&&"!&&#