Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/159/2005 • CJ GE ATA/159/2005 Généré par l'IA

Waiver of Strict Contractual Deadlines by Course of Conduct

Numéro de cause ATA/159/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a party had waived its right to enforce a contractual provision by accepting late payments without timely objection over a period, despite the contract explicitly requiring strict adherence to payment deadlines. The court reasoned that while strict adherence to a contractually defined time for performance may be essential, a consistent course of conduct by the parties, such as the acceptance of late payments without prompt protest, can demonstrate an implied modification or waiver of the strict timeline, thereby precluding the party accepting the late payments from later insisting upon strict compliance without first giving reasonable notice that it will resume enforcement of the original terms.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Waiver of Strict Contractual Deadlines by Course of Conduct: The court reasoned that while strict adherence to a contractually defined time for performance may be essential, a consistent course of conduct by the parties, such as the acceptance of late payments without prompt protest, can demonstrate an implied modification or waiver of the strict timeline, thereby precluding the party accepting the late payments from later insisting upon strict compliance without first giving reasonable notice that it will resume enforcement of the original terms.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partie au contrat renonciation au droit observation du délai délai de résiliation exécution forclusion par tolérance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is applied in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

 

      









          



         ! "#  $$        %&'(")))))))))) 





      !"#

  

'(   )**  + ),- &&./  ,,**     0*,123))*4*#156,,**71*,,* 3,) 1 8* 9999999999/ ,***) : 5;/   )**  0,***3*0*,123))*4*#1560 < 7" =* &&"(

(  ' =;* &&$/0 < ):,,**, *1)*)**+),- &&.(

"(   *  '& , &&$/  )*#=*   ,,**  ,* *-,***3,*1)*0 < (

  ,,***,*>*0 < ;*1,  *1)*   )**   )* *  0;*  1 : ? *1))/,***>*)**-)(

 

'(  @0*A *1),***;' 1,- 'B+$ 4  #  $ '&7/ 0*)   1/  ** 1)-/  1  )** ,,*, ,*;)/ )   ,*3, *;-(

     015/  *- ,***3  1 >   11**)0*%.*)  1);C>):  *) *,1)  ,* 033* :  =*** ,***; ,1)(  ,,**   33 ** D1), 0 ,  *1)* 0   )**/ 3,), : 0* +.     0     * $A  *;   >* * * 1;  ,*5)(*11*3,,>? **(

(   ;   >* 1)5/  ,  *1)* ,* ,, ))*;-*):,,**(

  0***E/),,1F(

 GGGGG

!$%"! &&$ "!"#

"  *        

) *;-  ,  *1)*  '  =;* &&$ 3,) 1 0,***3*)**,,** 0*,123))*+),- &&./,*,,H

  * :  ,,** 1 >0   * , 0*1)*H

*>I*I11FI),,H

,,*>  1) ? : 0,*** 3* / : 8* 9999999999**>0:,,**0*,123))*(

@*)E6 8(CJ5/1)*/8,K*/8( J)*/8,/=E/ 8(K*/=E11)(

, *-,***36

E33*5#=*6  1)*6     (*#@*E* <(CJ5  

1*3,?)),,*>)D1*(

 5;/  E33*56           

!$%"! &&$