Deficiency Calculation in Foreclosure Sale Litigation
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA litigant sought review of a judgment that upheld a deficiency determination following a foreclosure sale of secured property, contending that the procedure used to calculate the deficiency was statutorily improper because it failed to properly account for appraisal or market value, specifically arguing that the sale price was artificially depressed. The court reasoned that the relevant statute provided a clear mechanism for determining the deficiency by subtracting the actual sale price from the outstanding debt, and absent a finding that the sale was conducted in bad faith or that an accepted appraisal was grossly inadequate, the statutory formula based on the actual sale price must control, thereby affirming the lower court's adherence to the statutory requirement.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Deficiency Calculation in Foreclosure Sale Litigation: The court reasoned that the relevant statute provided a clear mechanism for determining the deficiency by subtracting the actual sale price from the outstanding debt, and absent a finding that the sale was conducted in bad faith or that an accepted appraisal was grossly inadequate, the statutory formula based on the actual sale price must control, thereby affirming the lower court's adherence to the statutory requirement.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Texte complet
!" #$%%%%%%
!"#
&
() *!&+,-.!&&'/ .01...+,,.-0 .2,#,10!&&%34. 555555,.. ! -10 !&&% ,31 . 67. 8.+1. 9. 3:; <) .0 , 1. = 67 4) 555555,11 >?@&&) 9 "'$"!&&'<)
.*,,.+.,A3.(1!&&')
!) '1!&&'/4) 555555,3,7++ .01...+ 1,-..2713,.,/3,.B!&+,-.!&&'/ . -. 3C, 1 . .7, B8. -. .,)
=8.D8,1. >?@&&) E)
F) ..,,1.3.+1. )
&
() 2... 1...- B. ,../ +. 3,,119)G')(.3,1...- (!310($G@ @(&<)
!) +.3-+.8028,1.,.2 :.+..,..9)G')# <)
F) . 3,., ' 1 !&&' . .. ,1. ,11+.13.)
.1,., . - ,.0,. .0 1...+/.2.+.88,111.=674) 555555 3, "#%(#"!&&%)
,11 3H 3 3, ,1. ,11)
IIIII
"$!%"!&&' F"#
& &
'()!$*
, -0 .2, ' 1 !&&' 3 4. 555555 8* .01...+!&+,-.!&&'J
)!"*
81J
8,11 >?@&&) 1.=674. 555555 K "#%(#"!&&%J
.BL.L33HL,11J
. B/ +1,1 A . G! .- . +,, .0 +,, (' 2. !&&@ 9 ? M ('F)((&</ 3, * 3 * 3, 2 B. .- .+.. 3 - .0 +,,/ 3 -. 1.:.30.J1,1....B./ 1.+1C3-3.71.J. . * , .0 +,,/ (&&& (#/ 3 -. 3 3 -. ,.B A .. L. #! ?) 3, * 3.: 3. / .-B, 11 1C 3-/ .- * 2. = L-.J
11.B3,*=4. 5555553.+1./,31 .67.8.+1.)
M.,7; 41-C/3,./4)C6:/4) 6,./41/27/ 4) /2733,)
1 .01...+;
7++.: 2.2)).); -. 3,.; ) )-C
"$!%"!&&' #"#
3.+1*,,11.B,A3.)
:-/ 7++.:;
"$!%"!&&'