Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/156/2007 • CJ GE ATA/156/2007 Généré par l'IA

Deficiency Calculation in Foreclosure Sale Litigation

Numéro de cause ATA/156/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A litigant sought review of a judgment that upheld a deficiency determination following a foreclosure sale of secured property, contending that the procedure used to calculate the deficiency was statutorily improper because it failed to properly account for appraisal or market value, specifically arguing that the sale price was artificially depressed. The court reasoned that the relevant statute provided a clear mechanism for determining the deficiency by subtracting the actual sale price from the outstanding debt, and absent a finding that the sale was conducted in bad faith or that an accepted appraisal was grossly inadequate, the statutory formula based on the actual sale price must control, thereby affirming the lower court's adherence to the statutory requirement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Deficiency Calculation in Foreclosure Sale Litigation: The court reasoned that the relevant statute provided a clear mechanism for determining the deficiency by subtracting the actual sale price from the outstanding debt, and absent a finding that the sale was conducted in bad faith or that an accepted appraisal was grossly inadequate, the statutory formula based on the actual sale price must control, thereby affirming the lower court's adherence to the statutory requirement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
valeur vénale de l'immeuble mauvaise foi jugement de valeur détermination du marché en cause procédure de réalisation de gage immobilier condition légale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

       

  

   

 







!" #$%%%%%% 



   





     !"# 

& 

()  *!&+,-.!&&'/ .01...+,,.-0 .2,#,10!&&%34. 555555,..  ! -10 !&&%  ,31  .   67.  8.+1. 9. 3:;  <)  .0  ,  1. =  67  4) 555555,11 >?@&&) 9 "'$"!&&'<)

  .*,,.+.,A3.(1!&&')

!)  '1!&&'/4) 555555,3,7++ .01...+ 1,-..2713,.,/3,.B!&+,-.!&&'/ . -. 3C,  1   .  .7,    B8. -. .,)

  =8.D8,1. >?@&&) E)

F)  ..,,1.3.+1. )

&  

()   2... 1...- B.   ,../    +.  3,,119)G')(.3,1...- (!310($G@    @(&<)

!)  +.3-+.8028,1.,.2 :.+..,..9)G')# <)

F)   . 3,.,  ' 1 !&&' . ..  ,1.  ,11+.13.)

    .1,.,  .   -  ,.0,.  .0 1...+/.2.+.88,111.=674) 555555 3, "#%(#"!&&%)

   ,11   3H 3  3,  ,1.  ,11)

 IIIII

"$!%"!&&' F"# 

  &  &   

'()!$*

, -0   .2,  ' 1 !&&' 3 4. 555555  8* .01...+!&+,-.!&&'J

)!"*

81J

8,11 >?@&&) 1.=674. 555555 K "#%(#"!&&%J

.BL.L33HL,11J

. B/ +1,1 A . G!  .-   . +,,   .0 +,,  (' 2. !&&@ 9 ? M ('F)((&</  3, * 3 * 3,    2 B. .-  .+.. 3 -  .0 +,,/ 3  -.  1.:.30.J1,1....B./ 1.+1C3-3.71.J. . * ,  .0 +,,/ (&&&  (#/ 3 -. 3  3 -. ,.B A ..  L. #!  ?)  3, *   3.:  3.  / .-B, 11 1C  3-/ .- * 2. = L-.J

11.B3,*=4. 5555553.+1./,31 .67.8.+1.)

M.,7; 41-C/3,./4)C6:/4) 6,./41/27/ 4) /2733,)

1 .01...+;

7++.: 2.2)).);  -. 3,.;     ) )-C  

"$!%"!&&' #"# 

3.+1*,,11.B,A3.)

 :-/  7++.:;           

"$!%"!&&'