Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/141/2005 • CJ GE ATA/141/2005 Généré par l'IA

Collateral Estoppel Application to Non-Party in Privity

Numéro de cause ATA/141/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a decision that denied their request for relief, arguing that the lower court improperly dismissed their claim because a prior judgment involving similar subject matter was entered against them, even though they were not a party to the prior action. The court affirmed, reasoning that the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevented the party from relitigating issues decided in the prior litigation because they were in privity with a party in that case and actively participated in the defense of that prior action, thereby satisfying the requirement of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue previously.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Collateral Estoppel Application to Non-Party in Privity: The court affirmed, reasoning that the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevented the party from relitigating issues decided in the prior litigation because they were in privity with a party in that case and actively participated in the defense of that prior action, thereby satisfying the requirement of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue previously.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
principe de l'estoppel défaut d'une partie gage appartenant à un tiers procédure de revendication dans la faillite offre sans engagement péremption en droit commercial

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for ordering the Appellant to pay the judicial costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

         

  

   

 







 !"#  $%&#''  



   



( '' ')(*'' +')(,'' '   *''  





     !"# 

' 

'(   )  ' *+,- !&&$. /0+-+ / 0-  '& *+,- !&&$.  -1 2---*  ++ -,1  2  -+-  +,--+0+0-,2'#3-'$3-!&&#04- 056)-1+$*+,-!&&!( *-.  -1 2---*  2- 7  58  4(   +22  9:$&&( 00--6-;%-0+2---, '!021'<;$= > $'&?(

!(   - 0+  % 2 !&&$. 4(   --  -1 2---* 6 2  7 00-2 6+22  9: $&&( . --@+37*-1-0+3-23(

A(  BC-.++8+738(

'  

'(  B 6- ;%  .  3--- 2---, C-   +--    *-  0+  +22(  *- 0, *- 613 6+2-+-3D-*--+--(

  60D.+-++0+C+2-,1(

!(  B  D82   *-. +22  -2-+  0+ 2---,  A& 3- '<;E. 6+22 6/D 8++2 0 9:'&F&&&(  =( ! ( ' - D82?G  - -.  C  - 6 20 /--  0+  --+ 0--D.6+220)0+7 9:'$F&&&( 2/-22=(!(! D820+-+?(

A(  +--*-/2+06.0--0.01-6) 2-,+( 0.-+5008-*61--= :''''-( !G "A%A"!&&!!$3-!&&!?(

  6.+22+-3-*-+.,-2-H,  3-( 6 0C-. *2+2 7  0-C. 7 6- ;%     D82*-2-+- . -12---*2-7 58  4(   +22  9: $&&(  0-C6- -   2-+-+,--(

"$!%"!&&$ A"# 

  0.22 9:$&&( 6-1--820 +03---7/2--( *-.4(6D80 C2-/-*C6--6-0-+6C-(

#(  +C.+2-0C6)3+( *2+27 0-C-1+C6++00+6 "A%A"!&&! !$3-!&&!4(0+-+2.+222-7 58 -.-,7+2-+22( 0.4(-*2+C6,0+-+0-. - -C   ,- -*-8  2 0 +2+- 0-.    6-;; (  IIIII

  ' + '   

-$. #/

+,1+2-+22*2+04-05 %2!&&$6)'*+,-!&&$ -12---*G

. !/

3G

-CF-F00JF+2200+G

22-C0+)74-05--C6+02 62+82.6+C-0282(

B-+8K 42 ,@. 0+-. 4( @5D. 42 9-. 4( 5+-. 38. 4(.3800+(

2 -12---*K

8-D 3-3(K  ,- 0+-K     4( - (,@ 

"$!%"!&&$ #"# 

0-*2)++22-C+/0-(

 D,.  8-DK           

"$!%"!&&$