ATA/133/2006 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATA/133/2006 • CJ GE ATA/133/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Compliance Dispute

Numéro de cause ATA/133/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-03-09

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation and application of various statutory provisions concerning a regulated activity, specifically focusing on whether certain actions constituted a violation given the specific factual context of the parties' conduct and the language of the controlling regulations. The court reasoned that the relevant statutes were unambiguous in their requirements, and the established facts demonstrated a clear non-compliance with the mandated procedures, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability against the appellant based on a straightforward reading of the controlling law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Compliance Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant statutes were unambiguous in their requirements, and the established facts demonstrated a clear non-compliance with the mandated procedures, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability against the appellant based on a straightforward reading of the controlling law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

condition légale interprétation du droit action en constatation de responsabilité enforcement interprétation et application strictes champ d'application matériel des règlements

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to allocate the court costs for the proceedings.

Généré par l'IA

A/1142/2004

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Compliance Appeals

A/2825/2006

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Compliance in Financial Transactions

A/926/2006

Regulatory Compliance Dispute and Affirmation of Violation

A/1138/2005

Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Regulation Compliance

A/378/2005

Statutory Interpretation and Prohibited Conduct

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to allocate the court costs for the proceedings.

Texte complet

!"#$

$#%&&%'$$(%)$*&

+, - - ! "# #! #$%&

'()*'

/0 /1 2# (..*$ # 3% 4#'35 #6 7# 8# 9%# &88## 4#'35 : 6 9&88 %# 4"# $&# "#;& !9"&&<# 9=##6$ & #%$ &=# > 9& )! $ ## ;9 3<= & #& =" 7# = #3 & #&/?&%=7/??,4+.*0./60

@& &# 10A 9 9&88$ &# # &%# B &7 > 9 "# /0/ 4 9CD ''# - ' & 1?A1$ /(// 3% 160 # <= "<7 # EEE0#=0"5&#0

(0 9# =# &$ "# <& ##### & $ & # 79"# @0 0$ &=&$& 7 # $ =&<" ;&#< @> 9#<# #%# @7 #@>4#'35<& 60

10 (-& &7(..*$##8&=<& #&0 %# &"#= "# "< #8 =" &0 9 #& <& # # 8# ;$ & "# "< F= =#$ # %# 8&#$ & # $ #& &7#< &#& #(A 11#(3<= +.*0./$#8# = %#8# #& #&% 9&% &880

-0 &#,=7(..*$# =#<& &= 99&88$9#8&= ;9&% 7#; # #(,2%#(..+>?"0/*0

*0 @&&3'%79&% &=##&(,2%#(..+$; & & 8$& <& 0

+0 ##& , 8%# (..+$ # #8&= <& ; & &88 %# $ # #& # 11$ #%= (A$ 3<= +.*0./0

88 $&#99&88=#<& =;# 9 #& #< 9 &% #& & #% & 9<<= 9;# = &7#< #&= #39#=D >&0

%&# #& # ##;0

)+,-)(..+ '1)*'

,0 & ((8%#(..+$<& && ##&3 #7=## #8$&## 7= 9& &# 988 #80 ##= $ # & > 9 #& ##& #0

9#&#&$<& G&7 ; #&==#8&=#=G#88 &&## 0 9 # #&9 #(A #/"#8813<= + .*0./$3&;9#9%# & %# # &#<%&#0 %# &# #& &% ; & =&H # &# %&# # ; = &% = #3 # $ <# =#$ 9'# 9& #& 8=##$ &8&== > <# #&%&# ><# #&80 &;9#9&# & # &#<%&#$9 &# =#3# %# $> & =&#$ # #= # 78 # & &8#= ;9 =&H 9 # &=#>9#=D >& ;9#9%# &&% # &#<%&#0##&;&# 98&=#=G#80

A0 %# > =#; #&988 #8$#& / =(..+2 =0

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

)+,-)(..+ '-)*'

/0 2 = #% 2## #&&= $&=7' #=8#'%7&# %4 0/*9&# & ="7#(*&%=7/??- !'+.*I 010/ (# 0 &# &# &#9 >">9&# &=" 7#/(2#/??, !'+.*0.60

(0 &9988 #8G<4 0/,0( !60

& 8&#$ 9 &# & $ 9&88# & =$ & 988 #8$ & ; #'# # 88#== 8& ;9# B 7#&#%& 9H&&4 0/,0( !6$ 8&= #& 9## 9 # ++ # ( &# &=## #%/( =7/?A*4 ' */.I )A.)(..+ A8%#(..+ 8# 60

& #= > ## < 7# 7# &# 7#$ <# 8 9& 988 #8 &= #; &$ 8# # &=##&# %# 9 ## & &== =&H #&0 3 & ; <# #< G#& ##$ G #& > #'# &#% 9# # #%= 4 )+.)(..+ / 8%#(..+ 8# 60

@# 988 #8 9 # $ & B & 3 9G# #&#&4 0/- !60

10 @&2#$#H#988 # B 7# #%20&#% $& $B #&# #&" 3 &0 G= & 7 8 988 #8 G & =#8 = &% " 3 4:0 J$ 988 #8 = &%##& & =## #% # : /?,+0((-I :/??A0-/I )A.)(..+# 60

-0 93$ " 3 & & $ #= 7&$ =#0 88 $ <& & ;9 =&= 9&% 7#;&88&&# # #&= 0#%; "# <&##### $; 9 G& 8&# &# &= 0 9 # ; 9G#< & # ## # G&7# $### 0

*0 % ;# 3$ = # #& 988 #8 2 0

)+,-)(..+ '*)*'

& 8# ##&%2;9>&# 2< 8&0

KKKKK

8 # L88 #8&I

&8#=#9& 2>#= #>#3%&&8& &9##1.=(..+I

%& 8#&2;9>&# 2<8&I

# ; &8&== G # ?, #% &# 8 L&<# #& 2###$ ##& B & $ %&# & &# =## #8$ #G 2& 3 & #8# #&$ % #7 8I ==&#&&# ##;&#&$=& #8 =&H% & #< & &&= #I# &#G=# =&# #7 8$ /... /-I ##& #3 &#& & $ #%&; &== =&H %$ &#% B 2&# > L%&#I

&==#; ##&$ &#$ > ! "# # ! #$ %& & $##;L>#3%0

# #7=## #85 :0H"3

&#&8&= ##& &==#;G #0

3%$ <88#35

)+,-)(..+

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Compliance Dispute

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet