Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/132/2015 • CJ GE ATA/132/2015 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defect

Numéro de cause ATA/132/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appeal was lodged challenging a lower court's decision, which had itself rejected a prior appeal regarding a matter originating from an administrative ruling. The higher court ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible, implying that the procedural requirements for the appeal were not met, thus precluding a substantive review of the merits of the underlying administrative decision or the previous rejection thereof.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defect: The higher court ultimately declared the appeal inadmissible, implying that the procedural requirements for the appeal were not met, thus precluding a substantive review of the merits of the underlying administrative decision or the previous rejection thereof.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
vice de procédure exceptions procédurales tardives conditions matérielles recours contre décision de renvoi examen sur le fond recours contre des décisions administratives

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
8C_179/2015
Social Assistance Reduction Appeal Inadmissible Due to Deficient Legal Argumentation.
Généré par l'IA
A/529/2000
Appeal Inadmissibility for Procedural Defects
C/23933/2019
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiency
A/1574/2008
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Insufficient Procedural Grounds
A/3638/2014
Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Formal Defects
A/4881/2006
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Non-Compliance

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3513/2014

### [ATA/132/2015](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887453) du 03.02.2015 ( AIDSO ) , REJETE

Recours TF déposé le 10.03.2015, rendu le 07.04.2015, IRRECEVABLE, 8C_179/2015

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2015/0001/ATA_000132_2015_A_3513_2014.pdf)

* /