Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/109/2007 • CJ GE ATA/109/2007 Généré par l'IA

State v. Impaired Driver and Substance Possession

Numéro de cause ATA/109/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner was charged with, and convicted of, possessing a prohibited substance and operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, after police found the substance during a traffic stop where the operator exhibited signs of impairment. The court reasoned that the initial stop was lawful because an officer observed erratic driving indicative of potential impairment, establishing reasonable suspicion. Furthermore, the evidence obtained, including the substance found and the field sobriety and chemical test results, was deemed admissible because the observation of impairment provided probable cause for further investigation and subsequent search, thereby upholding the convictions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; State v. Impaired Driver and Substance Possession: The court reasoned that the initial stop was lawful because an officer observed erratic driving indicative of potential impairment, establishing reasonable suspicion. Furthermore, the evidence obtained, including the substance found and the field sobriety and chemical test results, was deemed admissible because the observation of impairment provided probable cause for further investigation and subsequent search, thereby upholding the convictions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
test de l'haleine appréhension détention de stupéfiants conduite en état d'ébriété qualifiée perquisition conduite malgré une incapacité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to impose court costs on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/1352/2001
State v. Appellant (Breath Test Admissibility)
P/420/2021
Appellant v. State Regarding Breathalyzer Evidence and Aggravated Drunk Driving Conviction
P/5918/2016
State v. Driver (License Revocation, DUI, Obstruction, Vehicle Confiscation)
P/26076/2022
State v. Appellant (Drug Possession and Obstruction)
P/23359/2018
Appeal of DUI, Obstruction, and Leaving the Scene Convictions with Partial Acquittal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to impose court costs on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

        

  

    



  !"#$%





$%# &'''''' 



( ) (( ** (( ( )& * 





     !"# 

( 

()  *+ ,,,,,,- .  ,,,,,,(%/$-  0+++.  ,,,,,, (!&' 12)++340++.+2.!56+(%5()

!)  7  + 4+ 4  2+  08+    2+9+ :+ 41;7 <-3..0+1++ +1)

$)  (%8!&&/-=!&>#!-3+..++2+?+@= A+>=5!B0">-C2+.++0+.=#&B0">=+) ++-  .40   2+ +.  ..  !' B0">- 09  .+.  # B0">.+)

D)  2+. 4  7  = 4+  82+ +2 = 3+E+ 4.+.- *) ,,,,,, 3 4 .  E+ C+ + .+ 4>.)  >++ C3 .2 + + 04. 4  F0+  .42 4 9:2+0<G-1C3+2+8+2+4H 4E+0.+9)

#)   I.  D 62+ !&&'-  7   +.  40+   +  *),,,,,,4+0+-44++3+(/+E..   ++ +1  (! .08 (%#5 :   7 'D()&(<) 3+. 3.+0++00.9-04308+- 00383..8+4E+.0+)

/)   +  ($ 62+ !&&' .  7 - *) ,,,,,,  ++C. C3+9+32+00++E+= )++.3+9  3+. =  .9-  .9 =  8 3..  =  8+ 4E+) 739+   +- 4.+.0- +  H4. C3+ 2+ E.  4+ +2   0+ 0.+-   .2440 .4+E.C2++)744-+2+8+ 4C+E.+2+-+2++E8J9-C+ +04+C+- 04   E+ C  E00  ++ 4-  08H .40)

')   !$ 62+ !&&'- *) ,,,,,,  ++  +8 0+++E 3 - 4 0 4 0  90 C3+ 2+ .244.   +($62+!&&'.7 )

5)   4+ 00.  +04  !# 62+ !&&'-  69 ..9.  H4+C.   C  6+4  +8 E..- 00  0+13H12+2=3+.+3+.-.++) ++- .402++.!'B0">-00341-K+-

"!$%"!&&' $"# 

E 0+E H4+-  + 0++00 8+9+  40+  + 4+0+-292+.0+9C3+42C+).+ .EH+.>.(#E.2+!&&'+...44 + C3+ +  =  4.) .  -   + 9.=693.+)

%)  6-*),,,,,,3.+=+)

( * 

()  6.  04 + 2  6+++ 04.-    28:)#/ +L9++6+++!!208(%D(    !&#M)/$)(+)+ 4.0+++2(! 408(%5#    #(&<)

!)  > + 4  +9H   0C -  4++-  +9HE+H2+0H+0:)!')( M(/!!L +9+++1#408(%'%N7-7'D()!(- O(&5 /!<)

$)   L+.+  +.-  2+ 0H+0 9..  2.>+ 4 + #& B0">- C  ++   -   ++   2++8++.E28L+D+.(L 19   ++ +1  ($ 208 (%/! :   7 'D()((M O (!((!'- (%%#//D<)

  7  6+4  +8 E..  0+1 LH1  2+ = L+.+L+.-.402+0H+0+.#= !&B0">+492+.C+6+E++042+0 L+(/+.$ : O(!!$'- (%%''$$-+)(-4) '$'<-.2+4++1: O(!$(&/- (%%''!#- +)!8-44)'!5 '!%.E)+)<)

   .40  !( = !D B0"> +- C = +-  +E+ 0P092+04+C199..+40+ L+(/8 )

   2>-  .40  !# B0">  4 K  4++4  +8+9+40++-4+20+++E+ 97+40++.9-E0+EH4+42 6+E+LH12+HEL08++-292+. 0+9CL+42C)+-6+4+1C 00+2++9+1L19E0 :)(/)())%&>)! M O(!$(&/- (%%'

"!$%"!&&' D"# 

'!#-+)!-4)'$(.E)+)M O(!$$'-+)(-44)D& D(-7(%%' 44)#!' #!5M "$5!"(%%5(/6+(%%5<)

  +4++444+8C+++++ E28    C  ..   E+E + 8  02+)  L9+-  EE-   0+1- L  .+.  +   E2+C4+8L.9+.+06++8: O((%8 (#/M7(%%$4)#$#M O((5(%&M(&58/'M(&D8#(<)

   L41-  .40   2+ +.-  0  .-..!'B0">41.+09.+.)39+3  92- ++ 4 3+ (/ +. (    - C+ +04+C  + 8+9+40++)

D)  73+(/+.! -.0++0+ +0+4100++3E92)E+ H4++44=+4-C.++7 -C+3+= 0++00-2IE+0.)

#)  2C+4.1-6.)

   3+  ++9-  .00  QOD&&)   0+ =  >9  -C+08:)5' <)

+  (*  (    

,-.$ /

.28+6.!D62+!&&'4*+,,,,,, .++2+08+2+9+D62+!&&'++ 40++4+0+M

.$%/

6M

0=>9.00 QOD&&) M

+ C- E0.0 H + 5!  +2   + E..   +8 E..  (' 6+ !&&# : O 7 ('$)((&<-  4. I 4 I 4.    6 C+ +2  +E++ 4 2  +8 E..- 4  2+  0+1+48+M0.0++++C+- 0+E0P424+90+M+

"!$%"!&&' #"# 

+ I .  +8 E..- (&&&  (D- 4 2+ 4  4 2+ .+C H ++  L+ D!  O)  4. I   4+1  4+  - +2C. 00 0P  42- +2 I 6+ = L2+M

00+C4.I=*+,,,,,,++CL2+08+ 2+9+=LEE+E..=)

7+.9; *)2P-4.+-)P>1 >.+-69)

0 +80+++E;

9EE+1 6+6))+);  2+ 4.+;     ) )2P   

4+E0I..00+C.H4+)

 12-  9EE+1;           

"!$%"!&&'