Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/107/2007 • CJ GE ATA/107/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Financial Instruments Dispute Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATA/107/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a judgment concerning the construction and interpretation of multiple written agreements related to specific financial instruments, arguing that the lower court erred in finding that a particular contractual term unambiguously favored the opposing party. The court reasoned that the plain language of the integrated agreement, when read in its entirety and in context with the related documents, clearly supported the lower court's interpretation, which rendered the challenged term unambiguous and thus precluded the need for extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent, affirming the judgment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contract Interpretation and Financial Instruments Dispute Affirmation: The court reasoned that the plain language of the integrated agreement, when read in its entirety and in context with the related documents, clearly supported the lower court's interpretation, which rendered the challenged term unambiguous and thus precluded the need for extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent, affirming the judgment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat notion de décision instrument financier accords particuliers arbitrage financier valeur litigieuse

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Art. 64 LTF
Cited in the dispositive for granting the request for legal aid because the appellant's means were insufficient.
Généré par l'IA
A/434/2005
Contract Interpretation and Financial Transaction Dispute Affirmation
A/1659/2003
Contract Interpretation and Loan Agreement Dispute Affirmation
A/3937/2006
Financial Instrument Contract Interpretation Dispute
A/3804/2006
Contract Interpretation and Extrinsic Evidence Rule Affirmance
A/48/2003
Contract Interpretation and Enforceability of Financial Clauses

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Art. 64 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for granting the request for legal aid because the appellant's means were insufficient.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

          

  

   



 !"#





#"$$$$$$



% & %% ''%% %&( ' 





     !"# 

% 

'(   !# )*+ !%%& , '-./%0 12 3333330 *2224  50 22  6 7 64.2   *4    7 2  2  22829:( .'$;0+,9.02) *2262<2)24)9(76 2.4 =9.764.22**2644)4   +   .4(  62  1( 333333  2 =2  *2    6  72+22  *22   2( 7244   <24  64.2  2   =*4 )6<4 )  4.*  2+90    =2 , *2  2  62 .4( 7*+27*2*6*064.4)2 672+22+(

!(   422  ! 6*+ !%%&0  62  *+2    6292>2 )?@8 A22,1(333333=29)*2 24922)42*20))22 72'&2=44222?'B4*+'B#; >  8-$'(%'A(242).47624422=0762)4 622)4C2C2222762 )*D264.2(

/(  2E!!6*+!%%&8 01(3333334 422 *24(  762 2  2=20 : )  F   64.2 ,    )2  7 .4 ) 920 *)  =2 *(  42  , =2 2=   62 42 )4(  762 ) 744  2 62 +2   64.2 )  ,6204=2(

$(   !! 6*+ !%%&0  8   *2  2 )4240   < 0 2+*222=(

#(  )*2?2*)2)GH)4) 241(333333(

&(  7244=24=,2*)2) ))24!/=462!%%-4494,I9(





"$$!!"!%%& /"# 



% ' 

'(  I4*)2*2,I222*)40 6+>(#& 2J922I222!!6*+'B$'    !%#K(&/('2(2)4*2226'! )*+'B;#    #'%A(

!(    2   *D   64.2  =E , )62  =* C 62   )   62 2 I H )4C2>(/'/!(' A(

  8792  72 <7  2 6 ,    ,  2272/24'7?922 2?'/6*+'B&!>  8-$'(''A0 22*)2<<722 *))2*9<2*620724924)  +2 *42 72(  *D2  64.2 C29 <   2242*64.2*2?)))24C 20)479> (88L"(8 0 2 222?0'BB&(/' A(

     7)?0 2   2 <    62 2  2=2  2 )62   .4 42 ) 92(   =2))))2<6H*244  , )  )+?* 2.+2 ,  *+22 ==2 2=( 0=2<64.24,9207)44 *7)F02*H*7*D2I2( =20 <72  <24  64.2 2+224  *22 7   )0  7))2*)7*)H.* *6*(

/(   I2) 0  2+ *222=  I 244 <)F64.242,4942C )  424 72(  792  7 = 960 D  2 +292)*22)4*22**2*2>('& ( !  K "'-%"!%%&  !' * !%%&K ";--"!%%#  !% 4*+ !%%#K "#'%"!%%#  'B I2 !%%#K "/;#"!%%#  !$ *2 !%%#K "!''"!%%$B*!%%$A(

  6<2)4?04228 =2C,2*24 7222=29)*22=2*44)2 +2 )=2 4940 ?  <  *  74 )  *22**49(

"$$!!"!%%& $"# 

$(     22 I4(  4**  M5 $%%(   *2 ,  .9>(;- A(

 NNNNN

)  %'  %   

*+,#-

4 6+   2I4  !% 6*+ !%%& ) 12 333333 42262*+26292!6*+!%%&K

,#-

IK

*,.94** M5$%%( K

2 <0 =*4* C 2 ;!  26   2 =44   2+ =44  '- I2 !%%# > 5 8 '-/(''%A0  )4 H ) H )4    I <2 26  2=22 ) 6  2+ =440 )  62  *2?2)+2K*4*2222<20 *2=*:)6)29*2K2 2 H 4  2+ =440 '%%%  '$0 ) 62 )  ) 62 42< C 22  J2 $!  5(  )4 H   )2?  )2  0 26<4  *:  )60 26 H I2 , J62K

2<)4H,1233333322<J62*+2 6292,J==2=44,(

8249@ 1(:.?0)4201*6:0I9(









"$$!!"!%%& #"# 

* 2+*222=@

9==2? I2I((2(@  )42@     ( 5(:.?   



)2=*H442<4C)2(

 ?60  9==2?@           

"$$!!"!%%&