Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/1036/2014 • CJ GE ATA/1036/2014 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Exploitation Permit Refusal Due to Procedural Non-Compliance

Numéro de cause ATA/1036/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The applicant sought judicial review of an administrative decision concerning the refusal of an exploitation permit, where the crucial fact was the applicant's failure to comply with procedural deadlines for submitting required documentation for the requested permit. The court upheld the refusal, reasoning that the formal requirements for obtaining the permit, specifically the timely submission of complete documentation as stipulated by the relevant regulations, were not met, thereby justifying the administrative body's decision to deny the exploitation right.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judicial Review of Exploitation Permit Refusal Due to Procedural Non-Compliance: The court upheld the refusal, reasoning that the formal requirements for obtaining the permit, specifically the timely submission of complete documentation as stipulated by the relevant regulations, were not met, thereby justifying the administrative body's decision to deny the exploitation right.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
respect des exigences formelles contrôle juridictionnel droits procéduraux détention pour insoumission retrait de l'autorisation recours contre des décisions administratives

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs because the appeal was dismissed.
Généré par l'IA
A/663/2020
Judicial Review Inadmissible Due to Procedural Non-Compliance
A/4530/2005
Judicial Review of Agency Permit Decision Affirmed
A/2173/2005
Judicial Review of Administrative Decision for Failure to Consider Material Issues
A/1847/2005
Judicial Review of Agency Permit Decision on Grounds of Arbitrariness
A/982/2022
Labor Inspection Permit Refusal and Recruitment Obligation Review

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3628/2014

### [ATA/1036/2014](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887281) du 19.12.2014 ( EXPLOI ) , REFUSE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2014/0010/ATA_001036_2014_A_3628_2014.pdf)

* /