Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACOM/88/2006 • CJ GE ACOM/88/2006 Généré par l'IA

Settlement Agreement Enforceability Due to Agent Authority

Numéro de cause ACOM/88/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a dispute over the enforceability of a settlement agreement reached during mediation, where one party later attempted to repudiate the terms by challenging the authority of the representative who agreed to the settlement on their behalf. The court found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the representative possessed the requisite actual or apparent authority to bind the party to the settlement terms, noting that the party had previously permitted the representative to engage in settlement discussions and failed to clearly restrict their authority before the agreement was finalized. Therefore, the settlement agreement was deemed valid and enforceable against the party.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Settlement Agreement Enforceability Due to Agent Authority: The court found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the representative possessed the requisite actual or apparent authority to bind the party to the settlement terms, noting that the party had previously permitted the representative to engage in settlement discussions and failed to clearly restrict their authority before the agreement was finalized. Therefore, the settlement agreement was deemed valid and enforceable against the party.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règlement du litige mandataire procuration apparente décision exécutoire procuration validité du contrat déni de justice

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceeding.

Art. 64 LTF

The court granted the request for legal aid for the respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

    

  



       

 !"#







$%&#"'(((((( 



)     *   



 + ,          



     !"

 )

'(  )*+)*,*-.. /,+0 %%&12) 3444444  ))  ++))    5)6)* 7 8 5 +6)9.),,):*)) $6) %%& (

(  ;  6) ** +)(  6) <* 9 ,) ,)   *))9.*)*+):)=(*)) ,*,*)6))0))(

"(  /0 %%&1*).*)*+): )+)9 ,)*))/0 %%&).)* 92(3444444(

  )*)))):)6)*)5,,))(

#(  *,'%0 %%%15)6)*95)60))* +(

  

'(  ;5)& )5)6)* &+)'>$"7 '"%81 ))*5,5,,))7('8,))= )56 7( 8(

(  ? +  @) > )* '   )) .**   .**))'A6)'>>>7 (;'%'81,9)1 ,*B)))+)))619:))* *))0()*1+)))6B)))16)),)) :5)..=9*))0*)):5)))+0 ,(*):5)*),*,  5)+,  5..)C ) .  . 9  ,,   **+ 0B).   *  *) )0 5 , ).* ,  )*-= ,0=+9*1:D6) )5)*7 E'%$0'&%)("1'%"'>%)("C .() E' '"%/C !&&$! %%/''0 %%/8(

   5,=1 2( 3444444 5 * , *)  <   .*  $,+0 %%&))5*+)*,+)=.)"0 %%& ,)/0 %%&,*))"0 %%&(

!"#$ ! %%& "!"

"(   5) :  *))  / 0 %%& =6  )*F   )B*,2(34444447(&%),*+)))6 ' ,+0'>A/G  /'%H8(

#(  =1**)60(

       1  *++   ,I 7( "" 8(  )+)*   *   :) +,D  ,  5=-,6)?,*.),(

 JJJJJ

-  ).        

*)60)B* /,+0 %%&,2)3444444C

):5)5,,I5*++)*5)+)*C

++):  ,* *)) 9 2) 34444441 9  .*  ) *+):)16)B)):5)6)*1)):5*,+ 5)),0):(

;)*-K 2+6<1,*)C 2);LL L1++0

+++))5)6)*K

-..)=K  ,*)K       (6) (6< 

,).+*))**++):*?,)(

 =61  -..)=K   

!"#$ ! %%&