Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACOM/74/2006 • CJ GE ACOM/74/2006 Généré par l'IA

Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge

Numéro de cause ACOM/74/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A challenge was brought regarding the admissibility of expert testimony in a case involving alleged negligence, where the expert's opinion was based on certain statistical calculations derived from various data points, including historical occurrences, which the challenging party argued were too dissimilar to the facts of the present case to have probative value. The court ultimately found that the expert's methodology and underlying assumptions, despite some noted limitations in the scope of comparable data, were sufficiently grounded in scientific principle and relevant to the issues to pass the relevant standard for admissibility, thus upholding the trial court's decision to allow the testimony.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge: The court ultimately found that the expert's methodology and underlying assumptions, despite some noted limitations in the scope of comparable data, were sufficiently grounded in scientific principle and relevant to the issues to pass the relevant standard for admissibility, thus upholding the trial court's decision to allow the testimony.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
expertise judiciaire dépositions des parties moyens invocables force probante contestation de l'établissement des faits moyens de preuve médicaux

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of judicial costs, which are imposed in the final order.
Généré par l'IA
A/2983/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges
A/1940/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review
A/1516/2001
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed
A/212/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility in Structural Failure Case
A/3522/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony Referencing Prior Criminal Action

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of judicial costs, which are imposed in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

    

 



                      

 !"



 !"



 # $ 



!

  % % & 



     #$%#

"&

 '"()*+",- ../(   0  +)"1 '"  -2!#)&   0 3+!++ 04))(")5 0   -( ))+   )!  6,78%( 5"  //   !"  -( !  ) (  9" 1 9:( ))+   )! 6,78(*5" (*!"(9";+)<1# 9" ())+ )! 6,78=(*5" (*!"  >   9( ))+   )!  6,787  ,?@@( * 5" (*!"(-"!1A)")5  )!  6,8@8( 5"  8   * !"(  -"  +   )  ! +'"2!#)&  36?/8.#/=("+  B 0 -  0-" ()+)   0  - ,@@/C

 '"   0 "*+ ! "0"B!" 0!  ?,     " 04)) )" !" 0" + )"1 '" " ,. D" ,@%% 2 4#8.73)") +B !"!"1  B)+-"" )! )+!+C

 '")!"",@../(   0 !<B+"+) !"!   !< B  05 2!#)&  3  -+  ! !   !!   0   04)) 2!#)& !3E"- )!+"0-)!)+C

 '"0-+ E  )! " ! '"(  !++ !" "  1( ))+   )!  6,8@8( 5"  8 " !   !"  -# ) (  )+!+( ) !" " = D"  ../( '"0  0+ "!"1D!E!'" ))!)+ "C

 '"0 !+'"!(  +   ! + - 0"  )  ) !)+   54  55 E !) " , )1 ../C

 '"(  ! ( 0+ 04)) +-"  "( ) +*E7FG



     #%$%#

   '        %         

" 0 -E))!)+ ,)1../ -"  !  1A ) " )5   )!  6,8@8( 5"  8 " ! !"-# ) ())++ !++!" "  1C

'" 0+04))+-" ")+*E7F , )1../C

+-  +!   !  ! '" !!  54  0+ 04))+-" "C

!"'" )++!E 0 -()" ""+) !"!!< B H5'"HE !++!" "  1G

" !!"!! 0 04))&

B55  )+&       G  G-: 

)!5!+!++!"'"+"4)G

 -(   B55&   

$,?8,$../