Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACOM/71/2006 • CJ GE ACOM/71/2006 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Challenging Denial of Motion to Compel Arbitration Based on Unconscionable Fee Structure

Numéro de cause ACOM/71/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party filed an appeal challenging the denial of their motion to compel arbitration, asserting the contract contained a valid arbitration clause, but the lower court found the agreement to arbitrate was unconscionable due to an excessive mandatory arbitration fee structure that effectively prevented access to the dispute resolution mechanism. The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that while the contract itself was not void, the imposition of disproportionately high arbitration costs, which effectively shielded the drafting party from liability by making the forum inaccessible to the opposing party, rendered the arbitration clause substantively unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Appeal Challenging Denial of Motion to Compel Arbitration Based on Unconscionable Fee Structure: The reviewing court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that while the contract itself was not void, the imposition of disproportionately high arbitration costs, which effectively shielded the drafting party from liability by making the forum inaccessible to the opposing party, rendered the arbitration clause substantively unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
arbitrage mise à la charge des frais partie au contrat dépens décision préjudicielle attaquable griefs de procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

The provision is cited in the final order regarding the obligation to pay legal costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

    

  

                             

 !



 !"



 " # 

!

$%&$'%!()&%*+)% #, 

    #$%#

"&

 '"()*+",- ../(   0  +)"1 '"  -+!++ 02))(")3 0 -())+  )! 4,56%(3" // !"-(! ) (3"  //   !"  -( !  ) (  7" 1 78( ))+   )!  4,56( * 3" ( * !"    9   7( ))+   )!  4,565  ,:;;( * 3" (*!"(-"!1<)")3  )! 4%.%(3" 6= *!"(-" + ")  ! +'">!#)&  ?4:/6.#/=("+  @ 0 -  0-" ()+)   0  - ,;;/A

 '"   0 "*+ ! "0"@!" 0!  :,     " 02)) )" !" 0" + )"1 '" " ,. B" ,;%% > 2#6.5?)") +@ !"!"1  @)+-"" )! )+!+A

 '")!"",;../(   0 !C@+"+) !"!   !C @  03 >!#)&  ?  -+  ! !   !!   0   02)) >!#)& !?D"- )!+"0-)!)+A

 '" + )) !"%.B"../() @+"%.B"  ../( 7 E8  7" 7F +-8( !))+   )!  4%.%(3" 6="! !"-# ) ( )++A

 '"!!!!( + !+ - 0"  )  ) !)+  '"0     ++ '"   32  33D!)",)1../A

 '"(  ! ( 0+ 02)) +-"  "( ) +*D5GH

  -         .             

" 0 -D))!)+ ,)1../ -"  !  1< ) " )3   )!  4%.%( 3"  6= "

    #%$%#

!   !"  -# ) ( !))++  7 E8  7"7F+-8A

'" 0+02))+-" ")+*D5G , )1../A

+-  +!   !  ! '" !!  32  0+ 02))+-" "A

!"'" )++!D 0 -()" ""+) !"!!C @ I3'"ID7E87" 7F+-8H

" !!"!! 0 02))&

@33  )+&       H  H-8 

)!3!+!++!"'"+"2)H

 -(   @33&           



$,://$../