ACOM/68/2006 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ACOM/68/2006 • CJ GE ACOM/68/2006 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Third-Party Intentional Act Worker's Compensation Appeal

Numéro de cause ACOM/68/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-08-22

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision that denied worker's compensation benefits for an injury sustained during a work-related event, asserting the injury was caused by an intentional act of a third party and therefore compensable under an exception to the general rule barring compensation for self-inflicted injuries or injuries resulting from the claimant's intoxication. The court affirmed the denial, reasoning that the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the injury resulted from an intentional act as defined by the statute, nor did it show that the intoxication was not the proximate cause of the injury, thus failing to meet the necessary criteria for the statutory exception.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant v. Third-Party Intentional Act Worker's Compensation Appeal: The court affirmed the denial, reasoning that the evidence did not sufficiently establish that the injury resulted from an intentional act as defined by the statute, nor did it show that the intoxication was not the proximate cause of the injury, thus failing to meet the necessary criteria for the statutory exception.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

prestations d'assurance-accidents prétention de tiers lésion corporelle accidentelle prestation statutaire accident du travail droit à des dommages-intérêts