Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACOM/4/2008 • CJ GE ACOM/4/2008 Généré par l'IA

Electronic Transmission vs. Statutory Publication

Numéro de cause ACOM/4/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerned whether certain communications, involving the transmission of written material through electronic means, constituted a "publication" under the relevant statute, given that the content was immediately available to a specific recipient upon transmission, which was argued to be akin to mere dictation or personal service rather than traditional publication. The court reasoned that the statute's definition of publication, which historically contemplated dissemination to the public or a significant segment thereof, was not satisfied by an instantaneous, point-to-point electronic transfer to a single designated recipient, holding that the act lacked the requisite element of broad communication or dissemination necessary to qualify as a publication for the purposes of that law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 106 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Electronic Transmission vs. Statutory Publication: The court reasoned that the statute's definition of publication, which historically contemplated dissemination to the public or a significant segment thereof, was not satisfied by an instantaneous, point-to-point electronic transfer to a single designated recipient, holding that the act lacked the requisite element of broad communication or dissemination necessary to qualify as a publication for the purposes of that law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
transmission des actes notification écrite communication électronique des écrits support d'information droit de l'information transmission de données Incompétence CRUNI ; absence de décision sur opposition.

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 106 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

    

  



          

 !"#







$"%%%%%% 



            



  & '                  



     !"

 ( 

$'   ())  " (*+ &&%,  )-)) *)))-  )  () .)/01  2 3  4)-)(  0- .)/01 4)-)(3  )5*(6*677777784)-)((/((9:*))) 4()*))5('

  )())))8)-)()4//))'

'  6*6777777))))4)-)(.)/01 34/ $(*+ &&%' 94) ());4:)5()(*)8)<'

='  6*67777774> /?)())8( 9 ,  ((/)(5)/)"?-) &&@'

"'  A?-) &&@,6*6777777(9 ) 8*)*)4//))B5 2 '

#'  /)  4   )) 8  )  A ?-) &&@  (( *)94)-)(/)5*)'

   

$'     4) $  0C* ) )5 : /( 4//))     # 5(-) $A%% .3,   ())  //))?9/0 '

'   ())  " (*+ &&% 4( /  ())  //)), 4986*67777774(9 '

  *)94)-)(,//))4)D")($ )/(*)))-$ /*+$A@#.  #$&3'

='  /(())//))4)%  '

"'  ))C(**/E.'==3'



 FFFFF

!#$% ! &&% =!"

)   (*           

( )-+   )?(  " (*+ &&% / 6* 6777777   ())  " (*+ &&%   )-)) *)))-  )  ()G

*94)-)(0-,)/)-))*)))-) (),/8)))84)-)G

)84)4//E4(**G

) 8, 5*(* : ) @   )-   ) 5((   )+ 5(($%?) &&#. H2$%='$$&3,/(())/I/( ?8))-)5))/- )+5((,/-) *)0)/+)G*(*))))8), *)5*>/-/)C*)G) ) I (  )+ 5((, $&&&  $", / -) /  / -) ()8 : ))  4) "   H'  /( ())   /)0  /)  , )-8(  *>  /-, )- I ?) 9 4-)G

)8  /( ()) 9 6* 6777777,  -) ?))8  4)-)(,9)-))*)))-)()))84(/* 4))/+)8'

2)(C1 6*->,/()G 6)2BB,**+

*))4)-)(1

C55)01  /()1       '-) '-> 

!#$% ! &&% "!"

/)5*())(()8(:/)'

 0-,  C55)01           

!#$% ! &&%