Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACOM/15/2005 • CJ GE ACOM/15/2005 Généré par l'IA

Enforceability of Asset Division Agreement Under Alleged Duress

Numéro de cause ACOM/15/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the enforceability of an agreement regarding the division of proceeds from the sale of a significant asset, where one party alleged that the agreement was void due to duress stemming from a threat to terminate a crucial related transaction and the other party claimed the agreement was valid and supported by sufficient consideration. The court held that the evidence supported a finding that the party seeking to void the agreement did not establish that they entered into the agreement solely under improper threat without any reasonable alternative, thereby upholding the validity of the agreement and affirming the resulting division of proceeds.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforceability of Asset Division Agreement Under Alleged Duress: The court held that the evidence supported a finding that the party seeking to void the agreement did not establish that they entered into the agreement solely under improper threat without any reasonable alternative, thereby upholding the validity of the agreement and affirming the resulting division of proceeds.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
crainte fondée fortune bénéfice contrat possessoire exécution d'une sentence arbitrale saisie de biens

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/5274/2012
Enforceability of Sale Agreement Upheld Despite Duress Claim Over Price Negotiation
C/15452/2001
Validity of Prenuptial Agreement Regarding Asset Division
A/4221/2006
Settlement Agreement Validity Under Duress and Consideration Challenge
A/2848/2007
Validity of Asset Division Settlement Agreement
A/2802/2005
Enforceability of Transfer Agreement Upheld Despite Claims of Lack of Consideration

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

       

  



          









 !!!!!!!!!! 



  " 

#

                 



     !"# 

 $ 

%'  () *+ +  ,,- ,+  .)-  ) /,)),,0/,1,-213, 425/,1,-6% 7,!&&#+1,,4,.-,'

!'   ,8396%4):!&&#+,1,,),,,1  ,  -, 3 9 6 ,  ., 1, ;  ,4<)   -, ,,+ 0 1,  ,4<)  /=) 4-4, 4-,+ :  )>  %?@A+  ,.,, 4 = ,, /,)),, 4-1 4/,1,-+/8,,-,1-44B/,8,'

  /,,,   1,   -, /44,, .,8,  4,   4'

$'   %! : !&&#+ () *  -4,;- 42  (,  ,+ C.    9 + ..,) ;  ,4<)   -,  4,+;,,2=,1,-,+-,0.,-;,1 ,4<)4/,1,-+,,/,)),,'

   1, /, 4-:) -- ,)),- = ,1,-  4C8:'

#'  ,-  ,1, ))  44,,+   9  / 7-    %D : !&&#+  -,   7 4 8, /B 4 -- 4-' /E , -- ; /44,, ,   ),2 -- 7-   .'

D'  ()*.)-),-,!!: !&&#42,/),,,/,1,-+7-@1): !&&#4-.),.1'

F'     ,7-  42   )),,    /,1,-3 64%&1):!&&#'

  ,   8),+  -4, ; /,1,- , ,- /-  ,) 4 , ,8,.,  . /,)),,+  ;, , 1, - 0 4 ;  -, ),,,. -, ,-- 1  ,4'

  ,44))-) '

"!$%!"!&&# $"# 

A'   ,  %  $ -): !&&#+ () *    ,,-  ) 41,, 8+ ;  -- 7- 4  4-, +-,,!&-):!&&#3 ("%%A"!&&#6'

@'  /,1,- /44  + /44,,  /-, - ),.),1+ ,/,1;)),.440 7,.,'

   

%'  ,,8--,,44,,%D:!&&#,7- -,-8.)4,42/,-)4-+ 1:3'F!,/,1,-!F),%?A$ G %$&H'@A 28)/,1,-A4):%?@@ G %$&'&FH'!F!A  28) , ,. = 4- /44,,     !D .-1,%?AA 6'

!' '    /, # + /44,, , I .)-    7;,,1,.,,-,,'

 :' -,-),.,=-4,,, 44,:/I48-+,-4+,/4 -8,, )I)' /,)4-,.+,-;,;,/8,4 -,4,.-,,;-;,.:,8, 3'%F'%,4-),,,1%!4):%?@D     D %&H $# H 9 %?@? #%@H J !'$&A"!&&&H ("%&"!&&#  !$ .-1,!&&#7,4,-6'

  /42+.)44,,%!:!&&#+, 0 -,74-,-+()*8,,1); -,, 9 %4):!&&#1-.,,,1'

$'  /,1;)4IC)440,-;/ ,1-/,)4,:,,-/8,0)4'

  ,,+-),2=4;44,,-- .)- ,1)+  /44 ;  1,  ;  -, ),,,.,-,-;-,/'

  +  ,,8 ;,  /:1,  -,   4,,4 8--)   , ,+ 1 I 44,;-   )I) ),2 4-,-8=-,7,,,3 J!'!!$"!&&&H!'%!&"!&&!6'

#'  ,I7-'

"!$%!"!&&# #"# 

  ,,8+-))4K3'$$6'

LLLLL

%   $&           

'()* +

-1:,7-%!1):!&&#4()* -,,44,,,1,,),,,1,-, %D:!&&#H

)*,+

7H

,;M,M44KM-))H

)),;4--,,0()*+0,1,,),,,1 ,-,+1,7,,;/,1,-+,,;/-4) /,,4:,;'

9,-85 ()1B+4-,H () ),,1,(,9CC+)):

))),,/,1,-5

8..,25  4-,5       'J; '1B 

4,.)-,,--)),;-=4,'

 21+  8..,25   

"!$%!"!&&#