Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACOM/112/2006 • CJ GE ACOM/112/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Performance Dispute

Numéro de cause ACOM/112/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a contractual relationship concerning the provision of services, where one party alleged non-performance or defective performance by the other. The court reasoned that the contractual terms, as evidenced by the agreement and subsequent actions, governed the obligations of the parties, and ultimately found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the obligations were either properly met or that any alleged breach did not warrant the remedies sought, thereby affirming the trial court's determination regarding the contractual fulfillment and associated liabilities.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Contractual Performance Dispute: The court reasoned that the contractual terms, as evidenced by the agreement and subsequent actions, governed the obligations of the parties, and ultimately found that the evidence supported the conclusion that the obligations were either properly met or that any alleged breach did not warrant the remedies sought, thereby affirming the trial court's determination regarding the contractual fulfillment and associated liabilities.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
obligations contractuelles rapport de prestation action en exécution action en responsabilité offre effective différend commercial Refus d'immatriculation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited for the apportionment of the court costs.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
Cited for awarding costs to the respondent.
Généré par l'IA
A/162/2004
Contractual Performance Dispute
A/3733/2005
Contract Breach and Specific Performance Dispute
A/2988/2006
Contractual Payment Dispute Over Work Performance
A/374/2007
Contract Dispute Over Performance and Financial Obligations
A/1781/2002
Contractual Breach and Performance Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited for the apportionment of the court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

Cited for awarding costs to the respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

     

 



      

 !"#  







$%&' #())))))) 



 *+



                



     !"

,

()  *+ ,,,,,,,- .  ,,,,,,(%$$- /+++. 0 +-  1-  2..  (  3.4+ &&'  / 5+//++ 0 6+4+.  74-4+4.8273.+ ./+9  + :+27;  3.<)  2.++ 95+ =++  +2>/  3+ 6. +- 0 4+  =. ?.. @ .+ ++3+9-/+A+ &&')

)   &3.4+ &&'-5 2/+++3.+:+27 ; 6 <  //+9. 0 5+.. 2 + .+9  +  3/+  2/+ B 22. 2  3.) *) ,,,,,,,  .2 95+.++..?+52+:C <)

#)  5.. &&'-*),,,,,,,/+06 4. =.- 9 + + 95+ 4+ =  /B ?..  (&  &)

#)   +  (  2/= &&'- 6   A.  / 6+//++  /+3 9   =. 3D+ /2  /B6/+(  &+706+4+.74)

   .++ .+ 2+= 622++ 27  83   +4++ /+++4+.+:+27; E <)

F)  (F2/= &&'-27+G2.83  E 93+-27=+.B.HE+B-54+2 +  /B 9+ 2 5+4+.  74-  + 4+ .. 2+  2+9G/=.)=2+ 2G.2+.3+)276+..+++++6+ 6.?+3+93+2+I/+05+4+.74-J K B .++ .A0)  + .+ /2?. 6 .+    //+.=+223B.346+..)

")  .++($2/= &&'-83 E A.522++-  /+3 9  /B + 2 *) ,,,,,,,  + + 2 7 0 5+4+.)

   .++ 24+ I 9. 4  //++    6+4+.:+27; <-.+A)

')  6+..  +A.    .++    E   ($ 2/= &&'-22+.#&2/= &&'-/+?33   # = &&')  /+ 0 I /+  =..3+ 5 .?+

!#"$%! &&' #!"

2++7295+2++4.?+52+27 3.)  33- + 4+ A 33.  =+ . +-  ==.3.22+..)+-+ 4+ .. 2+  2+9  A   G/-  9+ G2+9+  /4+ .=

L)  ..2+.0 E %= &&'-+?. 96.+.+4+..7/G/=.)A+?+  +   +- ?.?  2? 0 +- 9+ G2+ 9   4+ .. +4+ 2  /+  A+ &&' 2  = /.+G .9 0 5+?+ 5 ?I  2++  2++ +-9+24+G2+9+/++9+.+ G/=.)

$)   (  = &&'-  83    E   +3/.   9  ..2+   G  % = &&' 4+ .. /+ 0  - +++)

%)  4+. 2   0 .2  - 6+4+.  2..  ./++(&4/= &&')+3+2G ++ 5+//++-   4+ I A.)  .?+  24+2I.-2+.+.?+.+/   + 0 5+//++)  +  2=7/  . . 2  . + 4+ I 2. 0  +  +...5.+2 E )

(&)  2+.25+4+...//+9.2+3/+ -(F4/= &&')E-..?.0A?)

 

()  ++?.   .++  22++   2/= &&"  +A. .+.?3/2+276+./2.- 4=:)' +6+4+. '/+(%L#@ (#&M) $L7?/6+4+.L2/=(%$$@ (#&)&'M) ' L  7?/ + +3 G 2. 622++     " 3.4+(%LL<)

) )    5+ '# +. ( -  2 9+ 27  /+. ?B/+-  +2>/  3+ 5. .+4. 2  8 . 2.++. :C E<   + A?. .9+4  /+ 0 5+//++) 2-++6+//++3+G.2:)'# )#<)

!#"$%! &&' F!"

 =)    6+ (" -  + 9+ 27  /+. 3..-  /+.     + .9+4  /+ 0 6+//++M69+./+6.9+4+:) (" ) (   <)    .A0 A?. 9  ..?+ 6.+ 2 = : * 'F! &&"  L 2/= &&"M *! &! &&#  " 3.4+ &&#<)

 )  =  .9+4  2=+. 2     =8 ++. N ++ 6+//++ O ++=. 0   + 0 6+//++) E6?+  ++ 6 =. ?.. 3D+- .+- EE-/B/++/G+?.( ! &-06+6+ +8.3D+)

 ) .+/B?..(& &-+3+2 06G+?2.2)

#)  E  ++ 6+//++- 9  /B G+?. 2 6+4+.  74 6 2 .. +-  2 .4/ I /2. 2  .+ 2.=  G . 6. +4++ :( & .+ E<   /I/ ++ 9  8++ 0 6+4+.  74)-527-2.4/.)

F)  2-+.+4++24/.?22 22.++++6+//++2-+92  .   6+.?+.  +/   + ++ /+  G   / + .. 3.  96+  4+   +++/++: *! L! &&# &/ &&#<-.?+6B /2.4.+G2+-// /+76.+/++)-+..49.22 2/+73+-?4+.62./.- +I2+/22.6+//++)

")  49+2.7-+280 E 54+3. /5+//++)

')  *3.-295IA.)

L)  ++?.//2D:)##<)

 PPPPP   

!#"$%! &&' "!"

-  ,.       

/012$#! 3

.4=+A.#= &&'2*+,,,,,,, .+++4++/+++4+.+($2/= &&'M

12$%3

AM

+95+522D5.//M

//+92..++0*+,,,,,,,-0+4++/+++4 +  .+-  4+ A++9  6+4+.- ++ 96 .2/  6++2=+9)

E+.?; */4B-2.+M */QQ++*) 8-//=

///++6+4+.;

?33+7;  2.+;       )*+8+ )4B 

2+3/.++..//+9.G2+)

 74-  ?33+7;           

!#"$%! &&'