Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACOM/10/2005 • CJ GE ACOM/10/2005 Généré par l'IA

Assignment as Sale vs. Secured Loan Dispute

Numéro de cause ACOM/10/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the validity of an agreement where one party assigned its rights to receive future contract payments to another in exchange for a present lump sum, with the agreement specifying that the assignment was intended as a sale of assets. The court reasoned that despite the agreement's explicit label as a sale, the transaction's substance, evidenced by the retained right to recapture the assigned rights upon full repayment of the lump sum plus interest, indicated that the transaction was intended as a secured loan, not an absolute sale, thereby rejecting the assertion that the assignment constituted an outright transfer of ownership.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Assignment as Sale vs. Secured Loan Dispute: The court reasoned that despite the agreement's explicit label as a sale, the transaction's substance, evidenced by the retained right to recapture the assigned rights upon full repayment of the lump sum plus interest, indicated that the transaction was intended as a secured loan, not an absolute sale, thereby rejecting the assertion that the assignment constituted an outright transfer of ownership.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cession de contrat remboursement du prêt transfert de patrimoine trafic des paiements copropriété escrow agreement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the court fees.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied to rule on the request for legal aid for the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

       

  



            

 !

"#!"!"$% " %&&!''!"





((#!))))))))))  !"#"$%& '"()#* 

* 

  *  

!+

,   



     &+,-&

 , 

.1  ""***" "*+02%+00-)'  3"& 45' 67"#" 4#*'"27"2" "*'  !2 88888888881

  " ""* * "'"*2"""#!2 88888888881

+1  !2 8888888888  ""  *22""*  *  7"#" 

3 67** ""*"  .9:#"+00/1

  * %2 ;<7'' "'*" * *=*  '*;7 "*""*<1

>1  #" ; 2"< "*7'' "')' 7=  **" ..'#"+00/1

  

.1 ?* 7 " @@ " .   *"   * 2""  "#  .+  2%.9A/3 B /.06)*'' "'1    2C2"*" "*)7 *" 2"4"   "7'' "' *1 "  )* **D) * "   "*" "* E  2 "4  2 *#""*1    7 " +. " .  ) 7 *"    7*''" *  <C  **2*#""*E"D %*"F 1 &" * *2 " 7"7D" 7 *" *D"*7 :"" "*2""  "#31+61

+1     *'*2 ; 7" "  "*  7''  "' < "&" 2C( * =7E "*7""*: ;*:<7;*" *)7 & ;&":<72*2 *G7 *" ***'* 1?** " :" "%')** 7'' "' #*"**%: ""**" "#)<"*'4*" ; 72""  * " "2*  *%"D "*) * * <" *   7E"   7 *  7 1    E  #( 7 "%  ''  "' ;  ""* D "# <"    2H  "*  ''     ""*) '  7"2"< 72""*   2 *)  "2"  ; " 3 1 ? ) "   *"  2""  "') .9A-) 1 9+>H I1 J) 7''  "'    2 *#""*  * 2""  "#) "  I .9K@)*-1+.K H I).99-)1>+061

,./0,+00/ &>,-&

   *E7 "%'' "';""*D "#1  )#*";"# 2*#""*3 I..K.A/  H !,-,+00/+K:#"+00/ '" 61

  "")   E2"  2 7''  "' * 7D  2*#""*1

>1  *'*22 E""DE<"D" "%"* "#" <  * 2""  "#)  2 *#""*    7 "+A"+* D" "2<"7#4 " 2" "7  '" *;#D" C *2*2"1 #() " "" * 2*") "":D2 '"" "')" <"#*" ;  *2 "* *#"*"   '*) " *  %* " %"#2  ;  72% "*"  *4  '* 3 I ..9  /0@) *"1>61

-1   74)  *"* % "   *   *'* #<7'*1)" ) %"" 7""*2*#""*)*% """*<"<"#"  "2 ;72""**'*1

/1  *2  <"4)<C 2*#""* : 1

       " "D)  2*2    2" ;  (D   * 3 1>>61

   ,            

: 22*#""*'*2!2 8888888888.9 :#"+00/2*G #%H

" <7"7 L72*2 H

*22"< ""*)*");!"#"$%& '"()#*  * ) ;  '    )  #" :""<  7"#"  "" <M  2 7"  "*%"<1

  *2*22""**5 " 5    1*#=

,./0,+00/ &-,-& 

*"*'*2 ""* *22"<E "1

 4#)  D''"45         

,./0,+00/