Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACJC/706/2018 • CJ GE ACJC/706/2018 Généré par l'IA

Administrative Silence and Mootness of Appeal Period

Numéro de cause ACJC/706/2018
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a decision that upheld the dismissal of their administrative appeal regarding the rejection of a request for an order compelling the administrative authority to act, arguing that the authority had failed to respond to their initial administrative appeal within the legal timeframe, thereby tacitly rejecting it; however, the court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court had correctly determined that the administrative silence, despite the initial delay, did not constitute an implicit rejection because the appellant had subsequently filed the required appeal to the higher administrative jurisdiction within the appropriate legal window, thereby rendering the initial administrative inaction moot regarding the commencement of the statute of limitations for judicial review.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Administrative Silence and Mootness of Appeal Period: A party challenged a decision that upheld the dismissal of their administrative appeal regarding the rejection of a request for an order compelling the administrative authority to act, arguing that the authority had failed to respond to their initial administrative appeal within the legal timeframe, thereby tacitly rejecting it; however, the court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court had correctly determined that the administrative silence, despite the initial delay, did not constitute an implicit rejection because the appellant had subsequently filed the required appeal to the higher administrative jurisdiction within the appropriate legal window, thereby rendering the initial administrative inaction moot regarding the commencement of the statute of limitations for judicial review.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
licenciement administratif délai de prescription contrôle juridictionnel silence de l'administration décision préjudicielle attaquable demande de réexamen administratif

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal was rejected as inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision that did not require further review under the simplified procedure.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/12605/2018

### [ACJC/706/2018](/apps/decis/fr/acjc/show/1633709) du 06.06.2018 ( IUS ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/acjc/file/2018/0007/ACJC_000706_2018_C_12605_2018.pdf)

* /