SB.2013.41 • APG BS SB.2013.41 KI-generiert

Appellants v. State (Bodily Harm and Traffic Violation Acquittal)

Geschäftsnummer SB.2013.41

Gericht / Behörde Appellationsgericht

Rechtsordnung

Schweiz · Kanton Basel-Stadt (CH-BS)

Entscheiddatum 2014-05-23

Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in

Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Two appellants, charged with simple bodily harm and, for one, gross violation of traffic regulations, appealed a lower court's judgment concerning an incident where they were accused of injuring a victim. The appellate court reviewed the conviction and determined that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the necessary elements for the alleged offenses, leading it to overturn the prior decision and acquit both appellants.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO; Appellants v. State (Bodily Harm and Traffic Violation Acquittal): The appellate court reviewed the conviction and determined that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the necessary elements for the alleged offenses, leading it to overturn the prior decision and acquit both appellants.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

**Berufung** gegen ein Urteil des Einzelgerichts in Strafsachen Körperverletzung Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln echte Konkurrenz Entlastungsbeweis Strassenverkehrsunfälle Revisionsgrund

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The appeal by the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the accused (Beschuldigter) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatsanwaltschaft) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The Court applies this procedural rule regarding the appeal against the conviction.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVGer

Costs are imposed on the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger 1 and 2) according to this provision.

KI-generiert

Appellant v. State on Negligent Bodily Harm Conviction

Appeal Regarding Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm Acquittal and Traffic Offense Convictions

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The appeal by the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the accused (Beschuldigter) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatsanwaltschaft) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The Court applies this procedural rule regarding the appeal against the conviction.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVGer

Costs are imposed on the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger 1 and 2) according to this provision.

Volltext

Appellationsgericht des Kantons Basel-Stadt Ausschuss

SB.2013.41

URTEIL

vom 23. Mai 2014

Mitwirkende

lic. iur. Gabriella Matefi (Vorsitz), Dr. Caroline Cron,

lic. iur. Lucienne Renaud und Gerichtsschreiber Dr. Urs Thönen

Beteiligte

A_____, geb. [...] Berufungskläger

[...] Beschuldigter

B_____*, geb. [...] Berufungskläger

[...] Beschuldigter

beide vertreten durch [...], Advokat,

[...]

gegen

Staatsanwaltschaft Basel-Stadt Berufungsbeklagte

Binningerstrasse 21, 4001 Basel

Opfer

C_____

Gegenstand

Berufung gegen ein Urteil des Einzelgerichts in Strafsachen

vom 1. Februar 2013

betreffend ad 1: einfache Körperverletzung und grobe Verletzung der

Verkehrsregeln

ad 2: einfache Körperverletzung