Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 654/03 KI-generiert

Attorney's Appeal of Legal Aid Compensation Deemed Moot by Annulment of Underlying Judgment

Geschäftsnummer I 654/03
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved a dispute between an individual and the Office of Disability Insurance from a specific canton regarding the allocation of judicial assistance and the corresponding attorney's fees. Following a ruling by the administrative tribunal, which granted judicial assistance and set the attorney's fee at a specific amount, the attorney sought a higher fee through a complaint. However, after the federal court annulled the previous judgment and sent the case back for reconsideration, the attorney's request for a higher fee became moot. Consequently, the federal court determined that the appeal was no longer relevant and removed the case from its agenda without imposing court fees.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 64 LTF, Art. 70 LTF; Attorney's Appeal of Legal Aid Compensation Deemed Moot by Annulment of Underlying Judgment: Following a ruling by the administrative tribunal, which granted judicial assistance and set the attorney's fee at a specific amount, the attorney sought a higher fee through a complaint. However, after the federal court annulled the previous judgment and sent the case back for reconsideration, the attorney's request for a higher fee became moot. Consequently, the federal court determined that the appeal was no longer relevant and removed the case from its agenda without imposing court fees.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kosten der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege Schiedsspruchaufhebung Versicherungsentschädigung Wegfall des Rechtsschutzinteresses Wirkungen eines Nichtigkeitsurteils Vertretungsverbot für Rechtsanwälte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
The case was struck off the roll because the appeal became without object, which corresponds to procedural dispositions for handling such cases.
Art. 64 LTF
The Tribunal federal des assurances ruled that no court fees shall be collected, which falls under the provisions governing court costs.
Art. 70 LTF
This article implies the necessity of ruling on costs when a case is declared without object, although it is not explicitly cited in the final orders provided, Article 70 LTF generally pertains to the final disposition and related aspects in the context of the final decision structure outlined by the Tribunal Fédéral. Given the context (ruling on costs), and assuming standard application where costs follow the final disposition, and since no other explicit article is cited for the core ruling besides the procedural one for costs, this step is inferred as the general basis for the disposition structure.
KI-generiert
8C_853/2013
Legal Aid Fee Reduction Appeal Rendered Moot by Judgment Annulment
8C_958/2011
Appeal Against Denial of Legal Aid Rendered Moot by Subsequent Grant
1P.385/1999
Defense Counsel Compensation Appeal Mooted by Annulment of Underlying Judgment
5A_731/2008
Mootness of Legal Aid Appeal Due to Subsequent Favorable Ruling
5D_69/2013
Appeal Regarding Legal Aid Contribution Moot Due to Subsequent Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The case was struck off the roll because the appeal became without object, which corresponds to procedural dispositions for handling such cases.

Art. 64 LTF

The Tribunal federal des assurances ruled that no court fees shall be collected, which falls under the provisions governing court costs.

Art. 70 LTF

This article implies the necessity of ruling on costs when a case is declared without object, although it is not explicitly cited in the final orders provided, Article 70 LTF generally pertains to the final disposition and related aspects in the context of the final decision structure outlined by the Tribunal Fédéral. Given the context (ruling on costs), and assuming standard application where costs follow the final disposition, and since no other explicit article is cited for the core ruling besides the procedural one for costs, this step is inferred as the general basis for the disposition structure.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Eidgenössisches Versicherungsgericht

Tribunale federale delle assicurazioni

Tribunal federal d'assicuranzas

Cour des assurances sociales

du Tribunal fédéral

Cause

{T 7}

I 654/03

Arrêt du 21 juillet 2004

IVe Chambre

Composition

MM. et Mme les Juges Ferrari, Président, Widmer et Ursprung. Greffière : Mme Berset

Parties

B.________, recourant,

contre

Office AI du canton de Fribourg, impasse de la Colline 1, 1762 Givisiez, intimé

Instance précédente

Tribunal administratif du canton de Fribourg, Cour des assurances sociales, Givisiez

(Jugement du 18 juin 2003)

Vu le jugement rendu le 18 juin 2003 par le Tribunal administratif du canton de Fribourg dans le litige opposant M.________ à l'Office AI du canton de Fribourg;

vu le chiffre 3 du dispositif de ce jugement aux termes duquel M.________ a été mis au bénéfice de l'assistance judiciaire et l'indemnité allouée à l'avocat B.________ défenseur désigné d'office fixée à 645 fr. 60;

vu l'écriture de «réclamation» de l'avocat B.________ au Tribunal administratif dans laquelle il concluait à l'octroi d'une indemnité de 3'639 fr.;

vu la transmission de cette écriture au Tribunal fédéral des assurances comme objet de sa compétence;

vu l'arrêt rendu ce jour par la Cour de céans laquelle, statuant sur le recours de M.________, a annulé le jugement du Tribunal administratif du 18 juin 2003 et renvoyé la cause à la juridiction cantonale pour statuer sur les dépens;

considérant dès lors que, dans la mesure où le recours de l'avocat B.________ vise le montant de l'indemnité versée dans le cadre de l'assistance judiciaire, il est devenu sans objet,

par ces motifs, le Tribunal fédéral des assurances prononce:

1. Le recours est sans objet et la cause I 654/03 est rayée du rôle.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais de justice.

3. Le présent arrêt sera communiqué aux parties, au Tribunal administratif du canton de Fribourg, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 21 juillet 2004

Au nom du Tribunal fédéral des assurances

Le Président de la IVe Chambre: La Greffière: