Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_98/2016 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Vaud Cantonal Court Judgment on Invalidity Insurance Benefits Withdrawn

Geschäftsnummer 9C_98/2016
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an individual who filed a public law appeal against a judgment issued by the Cantonal Court of Vaud's social insurance division on November 24, 2015. On April 26, 2016, the individual formally withdrew their appeal, leading the Swiss Federal Tribunal to note the withdrawal and subsequently remove the case from its docket. The decision indicates that no judicial costs would be incurred as a result of this action.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Appeal Against Vaud Cantonal Court Judgment on Invalidity Insurance Benefits Withdrawn: On April 26, 2016, the individual formally withdrew their appeal, leading the Swiss Federal Tribunal to note the withdrawal and subsequently remove the case from its docket. The decision indicates that no judicial costs would be incurred as a result of this action.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Versicherungsleistungsentzug Invalidenversicherung Versicherungsleistung der Sozialversicherung ZPO-Bestimmung öffentlich-rechtliche Leistung Rentenaufhebung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited in the considerations as the cross-referenced rule, in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF, justifying the striking of the case from the roll (Order 1).
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for ordering that no judicial costs be levied (Order 2).
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the considerations as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal, which constitutes the basis for order 1.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in the considerations as the procedural provision governing the application of related rules for striking the case from the roll in this area of law.
KI-generiert
9C_152/2022
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_322/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Invalidity Insurance Benefits
9C_834/2018
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal (Vaud Cantonal Court)
9C_723/2017
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_110/2017
Invalidity Insurance Appeal Withdrawal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the considerations as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal, which constitutes the basis for order 1.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for ordering that no judicial costs be levied (Order 2).

art. 71 LTF

Cited in the considerations as the procedural provision governing the application of related rules for striking the case from the roll in this area of law.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in the considerations as the cross-referenced rule, in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF, justifying the striking of the case from the roll (Order 1).

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_98/2016 {T 0/2}

Ordonnance du 2 mai 2016

IIe Cour de droit social

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless,

en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Bleicker.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Eric Stauffacher, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Office de l'assurance-invalidité du canton de Vaud, avenue du Général-Guisan 8, 1800 Vevey,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-invalidité (retrait du recours),

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal

du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales,

du 24 novembre 2015.

Vu :

la lettre du 26 avril 2016 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours en matière de droit public interjeté le 1

er février 2016 contre un jugement du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales, du 24 novembre 2015,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

que, suivant l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF , il sied de statuer sans frais,

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral de la santé publique.

Lucerne, le 2 mai 2016

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

Le Greffier : Bleicker