Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_803/2016 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Geschäftsnummer 9C_803/2016
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a party who filed an appeal against a judgment from the Cantonal Court regarding disability insurance matters. Subsequently, the party decided to withdraw the appeal, leading the Federal Tribunal to take note of the withdrawal and consequently strike the case from the docket without imposing any court fees. The decision was communicated to the relevant parties and authorities involved in the case.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case: Subsequently, the party decided to withdraw the appeal, leading the Federal Tribunal to take note of the withdrawal and consequently strike the case from the docket without imposing any court fees. The decision was communicated to the relevant parties and authorities involved in the case.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenversicherung ZPO-Bestimmung Versicherungsleistungsentzug Rechtsschutzversicherung Insolvenz des Versicherers Nichtigkeitsverfahren und Verzicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
This article is cited in connection with the procedural rule that justifies striking the case from the roll.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
This article is cited to justify the decision not to levy judicial costs (no costs). Note: While Art. 66 al. 1 LTF usually concerns the imposition of costs, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF covers the specific situation where costs are not levied.
art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF
These articles are cited in relation to the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
9C_405/2018
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_633/2018
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_859/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_462/2021
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_127/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF

These articles are cited in relation to the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

This article is cited to justify the decision not to levy judicial costs (no costs). Note: While Art. 66 al. 1 LTF usually concerns the imposition of costs, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF covers the specific situation where costs are not levied.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

This article is cited in connection with the procedural rule that justifies striking the case from the roll.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_803/2016

Ordonnance du 17 mars 2017

IIe Cour de droit social

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless,

en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière : Mme Flury.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représenté par Me Sven Schwab, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Office de l'assurance-invalidité

du canton de Neuchâtel,

Espacité 4-5, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-invalidité,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, du 26 octobre 2016.

Vu :

la lettre du 14 mars 2017 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 28 novembre 2016 (timbre postal) contre un jugement du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, du 26 octobre 2016,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie de statuer sans frais judiciaires ( art. 66 al. 2 LTF ),

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 17 mars 2017

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

La Greffière : Flury