Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_571/2022 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits

Geschäftsnummer 9C_571/2022
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an appeal by an individual, represented by a lawyer, against a decision made by the Cantonal Tribunal of Vaud regarding complementary benefits to the AVS/AI (Old-age and Survivors Insurance/Disability Insurance). The appeal was initially lodged on December 8, 2022, following a ruling by the Cantonal Tribunal on October 27, 2022. The appeal was directed against the Cantonal Compensation Fund of Vaud. On May 26, 2023, the appellant decided to withdraw their appeal, prompting the case to be removed from the court's docket.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits: The appeal was initially lodged on December 8, 2022, following a ruling by the Cantonal Tribunal on October 27, 2022. The appeal was directed against the Cantonal Compensation Fund of Vaud. On May 26, 2023, the appellant decided to withdraw their appeal, prompting the case to be removed from the court's docket.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen ZPO-Bestimmung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Einstellung von Invalidenrenten Sozialversicherungsverfahren Beschwerdelegitimation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Applied to rule without court fees.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
8C_226/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary OASI/DI Benefit
9C_601/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary OASI/DI Benefits
9C_362/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Supplementary OASI/DI Benefit
9C_72/2020
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary OASI/DI Benefits
9C_802/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Applied to rule without court fees.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in conjunction with other provisions to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_571/2022

Ordonnance du 30 mai 2023

IIIe Cour de droit public

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Berthoud.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représenté par M e Lionel Zeiter, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Caisse cantonale vaudoise de compensation AVS, rue des Moulins 3, 1800 Vevey,

intimée.

Objet

Prestation complémentaire à l'AVS/AI (retrait du recours),

recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 27 octobre 2022 (PC 16/22 - 38/2022).

Vu :

la lettre du 26 mai 2023 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 8 décembre 2022 (timbre postal) contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales, du 27 octobre 2022,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie en appliquant l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 30 mai 2023

Au nom de la IIIe Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

Le Greffier : Berthoud