Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_416/2017 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal

Geschäftsnummer 9C_416/2017
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a social insurance matter where an individual appealed against a decision made by the cantonal court regarding disability insurance. The appellant had previously filed the appeal in June 2017, contesting a judgment from May 2017. However, shortly before the tribunal's decision, the appellant submitted a letter in September 2017 indicating the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the tribunal decided to remove the case from the docket, noting that no judicial fees would be charged.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal: The appellant had previously filed the appeal in June 2017, contesting a judgment from May 2017. However, shortly before the tribunal's decision, the appellant submitted a letter in September 2017 indicating the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the tribunal decided to remove the case from the docket, noting that no judicial fees would be charged.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenversicherung Versicherungsleistungsentzug prozessleitende Verfügungen Abschiebung Forderungseingabe sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF regarding the procedure for dealing with the withdrawn appeal.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
The basis for the decision not to levy judicial costs.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF regarding the procedure for dealing with the withdrawn appeal.
KI-generiert
9C_587/2011
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_673/2016
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal Before Swiss Federal Supreme Court
9C_859/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_127/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_890/2010
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited as the legal basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

The basis for the decision not to levy judicial costs.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF regarding the procedure for dealing with the withdrawn appeal.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF regarding the procedure for dealing with the withdrawn appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_416/2017

Ordonnance du 19 septembre 2017

IIe Cour de droit social

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière : Mme Flury.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Damien Hottelier, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Office cantonal AI du Valais,

avenue de la Gare 15, 1950 Sion,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-invalidité,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal du Valais, Cour des assurances sociales, du 3 mai 2017.

Vu :

la lettre du 12 septembre 2017 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 2 juin 2017 (timbre postal) contre un jugement du Tribunal cantonal du canton du Valais, Cour des assurances sociales, du 3 mai 2017,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie de statuer sans frais judiciaires ( art. 66 al. 2 LTF ),

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal du Valais, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 19 septembre 2017

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

La Greffière : Flury