Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_355/2024 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Old-Age Provision Case

Geschäftsnummer 9C_355/2024
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case before the Swiss Federal Tribunal involved a dispute over occupational pension benefits between an individual, represented by an attorney, and a pension foundation, also represented by legal counsel. The individual had initially filed an appeal against a decision made by the Social Insurance Court of the Cantonal Court of Vaud, dated May 15, 2024. However, the appeal was subsequently withdrawn by the individual on October 4, 2024. As a result, the Federal Tribunal, represented by a single judge, ordered that the case be removed from the docket, and no judicial costs were assessed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Old-Age Provision Case: The individual had initially filed an appeal against a decision made by the Social Insurance Court of the Cantonal Court of Vaud, dated May 15, 2024. However, the appeal was subsequently withdrawn by the individual on October 4, 2024. As a result, the Federal Tribunal, represented by a single judge, ordered that the case be removed from the docket, and no judicial costs were assessed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rechte älterer Menschen Einstellung der Rente Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Beschwerdelegitimation Berechnung der Altersrente Urteilsvorschlag

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Applied to rule that no judicial costs shall be levied.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF and Art. 73 al. 1 PCF for the dismissal of the case following withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF and Art. 73 al. 1 PCF for the dismissal of the case following withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
9C_637/2021
Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Retirement Provision Case
9C_71/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Benefits Case
9C_861/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Occupational Pension Benefits
9C_27/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Pension Matter
9C_393/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Professional Occupational Benefits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF and Art. 73 al. 1 PCF for the dismissal of the case following withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Applied to rule that no judicial costs shall be levied.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF and Art. 73 al. 1 PCF for the dismissal of the case following withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_355/2024

Ordonnance du 8 octobre 2024

IIIe Cour de droit public

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Cretton.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Jean-Michel Duc, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Fondation de prévoyance de B.________,

représentée par Mes Alexia Raetzo et Anne Meier,

intimée.

Objet

Prévoyance professionnelle,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 15 mai 2024 (PP 30/22 - 22/2024).

Vu :

la lettre du 4 octobre 2024 (timbre postal) par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 20 juin 2024 (timbre postal) contre le jugement rendu par la Cour des assurances sociales du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud le 15 mai 2024,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie de statuer sans frais judiciaires ( art. 66 al. 2 LTF ),

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 8 octobre 2024

Au nom de la IIIe Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

Le Greffier : Cretton