Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_232/2023 KI-generiert

Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Following Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Geschäftsnummer 9C_232/2023
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal filed by a claimant, represented by an attorney, against a decision of the Cantonal Tribunal of the Republic and Canton of Neuchâtel, concerning issues related to disability insurance as managed by the Neuchâtel office. The complaint was initially brought forward to the Swiss Federal Tribunal following the cantonal decision dated February 22, 2023. However, the claimant decided to withdraw the appeal on September 6, 2023, leading to the removal of the case from the court's docket without any judicial fees being levied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Following Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case: The complaint was initially brought forward to the Swiss Federal Tribunal following the cantonal decision dated February 22, 2023. However, the claimant decided to withdraw the appeal on September 6, 2023, leading to the removal of the case from the court's docket without any judicial fees being levied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Invalidenversicherung ZPO-Bestimmung Versicherungsleistungsentzug Rückzug des Gesuchs Subrogation des Versicherers Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited as a procedural provision applicable in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal (though often seen as a reference linking to the relevant cantonal procedure, it is explicitly cited in the operative part's rationale).
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for deciding not to levy judicial costs.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other articles to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with other articles to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
9C_704/2019
Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Withdrawn Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_552/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal to Federal Supreme Court
9C_564/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_206/2022
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_333/2025
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other articles to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for deciding not to levy judicial costs.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with other articles to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited as a procedural provision applicable in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal (though often seen as a reference linking to the relevant cantonal procedure, it is explicitly cited in the operative part's rationale).

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_232/2023

Ordonnance du 8 septembre 2023

IIIe Cour de droit public

Composition

Mme la Juge fédérale Moser-Szeless, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Berthoud.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Melvin L'Eplattenier, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Office de l'assurance-invalidité

du canton de Neuchâtel,

rue Chandigarh 2, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-invalidité,

recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel du 22 février 2023 (CDP.2022.50-AI/ia).

Vu :

la lettre du 6 septembre 2023 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 27 mars 2023 (timbre postal) contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, du 22 février 2023,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie en appliquant l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

par ces motifs, la Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, Cour de droit public, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 8 septembre 2023

Au nom de la IIIe Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Juge unique : Moser-Szeless

Le Greffier : Berthoud