Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
9C_23/2022 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal on Invalidity Insurance Claim

Geschäftsnummer 9C_23/2022
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an individual, represented by their lawyer, who filed an appeal against a decision made by the Social Insurance Division of the Cantonal Court of Fribourg concerning disability insurance. The appeal was originally filed on January 14, 2022, challenging the ruling from November 25, 2021. However, the appellant subsequently decided to withdraw the appeal, as communicated in a letter dated May 4, 2022. Consequently, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, specifically its Second Chamber of Social Law, issued an order on May 5, 2022, to remove the case from its docket without imposing court costs. The order was communicated to the involved parties, the Cantonal Court of Fribourg, and the Federal Social Insurance Office.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal on Invalidity Insurance Claim: The appeal was originally filed on January 14, 2022, challenging the ruling from November 25, 2021. However, the appellant subsequently decided to withdraw the appeal, as communicated in a letter dated May 4, 2022. Consequently, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, specifically its Second Chamber of Social Law, issued an order on May 5, 2022, to remove the case from its docket without imposing court costs. The order was communicated to the involved parties, the Cantonal Court of Fribourg, and the Federal Social Insurance Office.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückzug der Zivilklage Invalidenversicherung Zivilprozessordnung Dahinfallen der Versicherungsleistungen betrügerische Begründung des Versicherungsanspruches Nichtigkeitsverfahren und Verzicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Applied to order that no judicial costs shall be levied.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the reasoning that leads to striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in the reasoning that leads to striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
9C_619/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Dispute
9C_355/2015
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Matter
9C_859/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_42/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_416/2017
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the reasoning that leads to striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Applied to order that no judicial costs shall be levied.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in the reasoning that leads to striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Spätere Entscheide, die dieses Urteil zitieren (1)

C-3838/2023 (2026-03-03)
«…gefallen sind (zur Kostentragung von Parteigutachten durch die Vorinstanz vgl. u.a. BGE 115 V 62 E. 5c, Urteil des BGer 9C_23/2022 vom 30. März E. 7.2). Mit Blick auf den aktenkundigen Aufwand, die Bedeutung der Streitsache und die Schwierigkeit der…»

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_23/2022

Ordonnance du 5 mai 2022

IIe Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Parrino, Président.

Greffier : M. Cretton.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représenté par Me Valentin Aebischer, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Office de l'assurance-invalidité du canton de Fribourg, route du Mont-Carmel 5, 1762 Givisiez,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-invalidité,

recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal cantonal du

canton de Fribourg du 25 novembre 2021

(605 2020 212, 605 2020 213).

Vu :

la lettre du 4 mai 2022 (timbre postal) par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 14 janvier 2022 (timbre postal) contre l'arrêt rendu par la Ie Cour des assurances sociales du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Fribourg le 25 novembre 2021,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie de statuer sans frais judiciaires ( art. 66 al. 2 LTF ),

par ces motifs, le Président ordonne :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Fribourg, Cour des assurances sociales, et à l'Office fédéral des assurances sociales.

Lucerne, le 5 mai 2022

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président : Parrino

Le Greffier : Cretton