Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
8C_59/2009 KI-generiert

Claimant's Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Dispute Against Municipality

Geschäftsnummer 8C_59/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In this case, an individual filed a legal remedy against a judgment issued by a cantonal court. The individual subsequently decided to withdraw the appeal, which led to the case being removed from the court's docket. The court acknowledged this withdrawal and noted that since the other party was acting in an official capacity, they would not be entitled to any costs. Additionally, it was determined that the individual who filed the appeal would be responsible for the judicial costs incurred.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 3 LTF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF; Claimant's Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Dispute Against Municipality: The individual subsequently decided to withdraw the appeal, which led to the case being removed from the court's docket. The court acknowledged this withdrawal and noted that since the other party was acting in an official capacity, they would not be entitled to any costs. Additionally, it was determined that the individual who filed the appeal would be responsible for the judicial costs incurred.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Schadenminderungspflicht bei Arbeitslosigkeit Normenkontrolle Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Streitgegenstand Verwaltungsbeschwerde der Bediensteten materielle Überprüfung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 68 al. 3 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for denying costs to the respondent, who was acting in official capacity (although not explicitly repeated in the dispositive, it explains the lack of a costs order against the respondent, which is a procedural outcome).
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for reducing the court fees charged to the appellant.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
ATF 134 II 117
Municipality v. Property Owners (Costs Indemnity)
KI-generiert
4D_68/2025
Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Dispute
4A_622/2011
Company v. Municipality (Appeal Withdrawal)
4A_404/2019
Withdrawal of Appeal in Employment Contract Dispute
4A_368/2008
Withdrawal of Employment Appeal
4D_89/2025
Appeal Withdrawn in Employment Dispute

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for reducing the court fees charged to the appellant.

art. 68 al. 3 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for denying costs to the respondent, who was acting in official capacity (although not explicitly repeated in the dispositive, it explains the lack of a costs order against the respondent, which is a procedural outcome).

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

8C_59/2009

Ordonnance du 23 juin 2009

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier: M. Métral.

Parties

S.________,

représentée par Me Alain-Valéry Poitry,

recourante,

contre

Commune de G.________,

représentée par Me Philippe-Edouard Journot,

intimée.

Objet

Rapports de service,

recours contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal vaudois du 11 décembre 2008.

Vu:

la lettre du 18 juin 2009 par laquelle S.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 15 janvier 2009 (timbre postal) contre le jugement du Tribunal cantonal vaudois du 11 décembre 2008,

considérant:

que le retrait du recours entraîne la radiation de la cause du rôle ( art. 32 al. 2 LTF ),

que dans la présente procédure, l'intimée agit dans l'exercice d'attributions officielles, de sorte qu'elle ne peut prétendre de dépens ( art. 68 al. 3 LTF ; ATF 134 II 117 ),

qu'il convient par ailleurs de réduire les frais de justice à la charge de la recourante ( art. 66 al. 2 LTF ),

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne:

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Les frais judiciaires de 300 francs sont mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal vaudois.

Lucerne, 23 juin 2009

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique: Le Greffier:

Frésard Métral