Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
8C_30/2019 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal from Administrative Chamber Judgment Under Public Service Law

Geschäftsnummer 8C_30/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In this case before the Swiss Federal Tribunal, an individual, represented by a lawyer, filed an appeal against a decision made by the Administrative Chamber of the Court of Justice of the Republic and Canton of Geneva on November 20, 2018, regarding public service law. The opposing party in the case is also represented by legal counsel. However, the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal, as indicated in a letter dated January 16, 2019, after initially filing the appeal on January 14, 2019. Consequently, the single judge ordered that the case be removed from the docket without imposing any judicial costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal from Administrative Chamber Judgment Under Public Service Law: The opposing party in the case is also represented by legal counsel. However, the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal, as indicated in a letter dated January 16, 2019, after initially filing the appeal on January 14, 2019. Consequently, the single judge ordered that the case be removed from the docket without imposing any judicial costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rücknahme der Verwaltungsverfügung öffentliche Dienststelle ZPO-Bestimmung Verwaltungskosten Verwaltungsbeschwerde der Bediensteten Nichtigkeitsklage im Gemeinschaftsrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited in conjunction with LTF articles regarding the striking of the case from the roll due to withdrawal.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for deciding without imposing judicial costs, as ordered in point 2 of the dispositive.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal for striking the case from the roll.
art. 71 LTF
Cited in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal for striking the case from the roll.
KI-generiert
8C_538/2018
Withdrawal of Public Service Law Appeal Affirmed
8F_13/2017
Withdrawal of Public Service Law Appeal Before Federal Tribunal
8C_205/2011
Withdrawal of Public Service and Constitutional Appeals in Geneva Case
8D_3/2010
Withdrawal of Constitutional Appeal in Public Service Law Matter
8D_1/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal in Public Service Law Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal for striking the case from the roll.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for deciding without imposing judicial costs, as ordered in point 2 of the dispositive.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in relation to the withdrawal of the appeal for striking the case from the roll.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in conjunction with LTF articles regarding the striking of the case from the roll due to withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Spätere Entscheide, die dieses Urteil zitieren (1)

A/1245/2018 (2018-11-20) · ge
Employee Revocation Appeal Upheld Due to Prescription and Proportionality
«…e.ch/apps/decis/fr/decis/search?query=8C_29/2019), [8C\_30/2019](https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/decis/search?query=8C_30/2019) **Descripteurs** : CONDITION DE RECEVABILITÉ ; NOTIFICATION DE LA DÉCISION ; COMMUNICATION ; CONCLUSIONS ; CONCLUSION…»

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

8C_30/2019

Ordonnance du 29 janvier 2019

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Beauverd.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Daniel Kinzer, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Maison B.________,

représentée par Me Sandro Vecchio, avocat,

intimée.

Objet

Droit de la fonction publique,

recours contre le jugement de la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève du 20 novembre 2018 (A/1245/2018-FPUBL ATA/1235/2018).

Vu :

la lettre du 16 janvier 2019 par laquelle A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 14 janvier 2019 (timbre postal) contre un jugement de la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève du 20 novembre 2018,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie en application de l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève.

Lucerne, le 29 janvier 2019

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique : Frésard

Le Greffier : Beauverd