Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
8C_29/2019 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Public Employment Appeal

Geschäftsnummer 8C_29/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In this case, a legal dispute arose involving Maison A. and B. concerning public service law, adjudicated by the Administrative Chamber of the Court of Justice of the Republic and Canton of Geneva. Maison A., represented by Me Sandro Vecchio, initially filed an appeal against a decision from November 20, 2018, but subsequently withdrew this appeal as indicated in their letter dated January 23, 2019. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, with federal judge Frésard presiding as the sole judge, decided to strike the case from the list without imposing court costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 71 LTF; Withdrawal of Public Employment Appeal: and B. concerning public service law, adjudicated by the Administrative Chamber of the Court of Justice of the Republic and Canton of Geneva. Maison A., represented by Me Sandro Vecchio, initially filed an appeal against a decision from November 20, 2018, but subsequently withdrew this appeal as indicated in their letter dated January 23, 2019. As a result, the Swiss Federal Tribunal, with federal judge Frésard presiding as the sole judge, decided to strike the case from the list without imposing court costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
öffentliches Personalrecht Prozessrecht Abschiebung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Zivilurteil administrative Entlassung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Used in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF to rule on the withdrawal and striking off of the roll.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Used to rule that no judicial costs shall be charged.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
The cause is struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 71 LTF
Used in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF to rule on the withdrawal and striking off of the roll.
KI-generiert
8C_600/2013
Withdrawal of Public Employment Appeal
8C_276/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal in Public Employment Dispute and Cost Allocation
8D_5/2014
Appeal Withdrawal in Public Employment Case
8C_562/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal in Public Employment Termination Case
8C_15/2020
Public Servant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Council Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF

The cause is struck off the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Used to rule that no judicial costs shall be charged.

Art. 71 LTF

Used in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF to rule on the withdrawal and striking off of the roll.

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Used in conjunction with Art. 32 al. 2 LTF to rule on the withdrawal and striking off of the roll.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Spätere Entscheide, die dieses Urteil zitieren (1)

A/1245/2018 (2018-11-20) · ge
Employee Revocation Appeal Upheld Due to Prescription and Proportionality
«…déposé le 14.01.2019, rendu le 29.01.2019, RETIRE, [8C\_29/2019](https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/decis/search?query=8C_29/2019), [8C\_30/2019](https://justice.ge.ch/apps/decis/fr/decis/search?query=8C_30/2019) **Descripteurs** : CONDITION DE REC…»

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

8C_29/2019

Ordonnance du 29 janvier 2019

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffier : M. Beauverd.

Participants à la procédure

Maison A.________,

représentée par Me Sandro Vecchio, avocat,

recourante,

contre

B.________,

représentée par Me Daniel Kinzer, avocat,

intimée.

Objet

Droit de la fonction publique,

recours contre le jugement de la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève du 20 novembre 2018 (A/1245/2018/-FPUBL ATA/1235/2018).

Vu :

la lettre du 23 janvier 2019 par laquelle la maison A.________ a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 14 janvier 2019 (timbre postal) contre un jugement de la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève du 20 novembre 2018,

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ,

qu'il se justifie en application de l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Chambre administrative de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève.

Lucerne, le 29 janvier 2019

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique : Frésard

Le Greffier : Beauverd