Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
8C_26/2007 KI-generiert

Appellant Withdraws Unemployment Benefits Appeal After Legal Aid Denial and Cost Order

Geschäftsnummer 8C_26/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a public law appeal concerning unemployment insurance benefits filed by an individual against a ruling made by the Cantonal Insurance Court. The appeal was submitted on February 20, 2007, with a request for free legal assistance, but the court determined that the case lacked reasonable prospects for success and denied the request for assistance. Consequently, the individual was required to make a financial guarantee for potential court expenses. However, on April 16, 2008, the individual withdrew the appeal, leading to the case being stricken from the court's docket, and the individual was subsequently held responsible for incurred court costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF, art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF, art. 66 al. 2 LTF; Appellant Withdraws Unemployment Benefits Appeal After Legal Aid Denial and Cost Order: The appeal was submitted on February 20, 2007, with a request for free legal assistance, but the court determined that the case lacked reasonable prospects for success and denied the request for assistance. Consequently, the individual was required to make a financial guarantee for potential court expenses. However, on April 16, 2008, the individual withdrew the appeal, leading to the case being stricken from the court's docket, and the individual was subsequently held responsible for incurred court costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kosten der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege Arbeitslosenentschädigung Versicherungsleistung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Zahlungsbefehl sozialversicherungsrechtliche Streitigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF
Used to declare the case struck from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC
Cited in relation to the decision on court costs by the single judge.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited in relation to the decision on court costs by the single judge.
Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF
Rule applied for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs because they caused unnecessary expenses.
art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF
Cited in relation to the decision by the single judge regarding the striking of the case from the roll.
art. 66 al. 2 LTF
This provision is implicitly applied as the costs are ordered against the appellant in point 2, although the text cites Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF for the principle of costs when withdrawing.
KI-generiert
C 111/00
Appeal Withdrawal Following Denial of Legal Aid
8C_203/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Unemployment Insurance Benefits
8C_573/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Unemployment Insurance Dispute
8C_512/2015
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal
8C_502/2021
Claimant Withdraws Unemployment Insurance Appeal; Case Struck, Costs Waived

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF

Cited in relation to the decision by the single judge regarding the striking of the case from the roll.

art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF

Used to declare the case struck from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF

Rule applied for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs because they caused unnecessary expenses.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

This provision is implicitly applied as the costs are ordered against the appellant in point 2, although the text cites Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF for the principle of costs when withdrawing.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in relation to the decision on court costs by the single judge.

art. 5 cpv. 2 PC

Cited in relation to the decision on court costs by the single judge.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

8C_26/2007 {T 0/2}

Decreto del 18 aprile 2008

I Corte di diritto sociale

Composizione

Giudice federale Ursprung, Presidente,

cancelliere Schäuble.

Parti

G.________,

ricorrente, patrocinato dall'avv. Patrick Untersee, Studio legale Sergio Sciuchetti, Corso Pestalozzi 21b, 6901 Lugano,

contro

Cassa di disoccupazione del Cantone Ticino, Via Ghiringhelli 15a, 6500 Bellinzona,

opponente.

Oggetto

Assicurazione contro la disoccupazione,

ricorso contro il giudizio del Tribunale delle assicurazioni del Cantone Ticino del 29 gennaio 2007.

Considerando:

che per atto consegnato alla posta il 20 febbraio 2007 G.________ ha interposto, con il patrocinio dell'avv. Patrick Untersee, un ricorso in materia di diritto pubblico con contestuale domanda di assistenza giudiziaria gratuita avverso il giudizio pronunciato il 29 gennaio 2007 dal Tribunale delle assicurazioni del Cantone Ticino in materia di prestazioni dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione,

che ritenendo il gravame d'acchito sprovvisto di possibilità di esito favorevole, con decreto del 19 marzo 2008 questa Corte ha respinto la domanda di assistenza giudiziaria,

che con decreto presidenziale del 1° aprile 2008 la stessa Corte ha assegnato al ricorrente un termine scadente il 16 aprile successivo per prestare un anticipo di fr. 500.- a titolo di garanzia per le spese giudiziarie presunte,

che mediante scritto 16 aprile 2008 del suo patrocinatore, il ricorrente ha ritirato il proprio ricorso,

che di conseguenza la causa dev'essere stralciata dai ruoli ( art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF ),

che il Presidente o il giudice dell'istruzione della Corte decide quale giudice unico circa lo stralcio dal ruolo delle cause ritirate ( art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF ) e, in tale ambito, statuisce sulle spese giudiziarie ( art. 5 cpv. 2 PC in relazione con l' art. 71 LTF ),

che le spese inutili sono pagate da chi le causa ( art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF ),

per questi motivi, il Presidente decreta:

1. La causa è stralciata dai ruoli a seguito del ritiro del ricorso.

2. Le spese giudiziarie di fr. 200.- sono poste a carico del ricorrente.

3. Comunicazione alle parti, al Tribunale delle assicurazioni del Cantone Ticino e alla Segreteria di Stato dell'economia.

Lucerna, 18 aprile 2008

In nome della I Corte di diritto sociale

del Tribunale federale svizzero

Il Presidente: Il Cancelliere:

Ursprung Schäuble