Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6B_847/2013 KI-generiert

Lottery/Betting Offenses and Drunk Driving Appeal Withdrawal

Geschäftsnummer 6B_847/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In this case, the individual filed an appeal against a judgment made by the Cantonal Court's Penal Appeals Court concerning violations of federal law related to gambling, driving under the influence, claims of arbitrariness, and the right to be heard. However, prior to the decision, the individual formally withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court acknowledged this withdrawal and removed the case from its docket without imposing any court fees.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 64 LTF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF; Lottery/Betting Offenses and Drunk Driving Appeal Withdrawal: However, prior to the decision, the individual formally withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court acknowledged this withdrawal and removed the case from its docket without imposing any court fees.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Prozessrecht Abschiebung Glücksspiele mit Geldeinsatz Widerrufsrecht Herabsetzung der Busse Ausstandsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
The appeal was dismissed by noting the withdrawal of the appeal, which often falls under the simplified procedure rules for concluding litigation.
Art. 64 LTF
Although judicial costs were waived (Art. 66 al. 2 LTF), the potential application of cost provisions concerning procedural handling is rooted in the procedural framework, but since Art. 66 al. 2 is the direct basis for the cost decision, and no other procedural article governs the withdrawal itself explicitly cited in the dispositive other than the general procedure note (which is often Art. 108 LTF), we focus on the explicit cost ruling.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
No judicial costs were assessed in the order following the withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
6B_182/2019
X.________ v. Cantonal Public Prosecutor's Office and Federal Gaming Board (Appeal Withdrawn)
6B_257/2014
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
6B_746/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Traffic Violation Case.
6B_705/2016
Withdrawal of Criminal Appeal
6P.183/2001
Federal Court Dismisses Appeal on Unfair Competition and Lottery Act Conviction

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal was dismissed by noting the withdrawal of the appeal, which often falls under the simplified procedure rules for concluding litigation.

Art. 64 LTF

Although judicial costs were waived (Art. 66 al. 2 LTF), the potential application of cost provisions concerning procedural handling is rooted in the procedural framework, but since Art. 66 al. 2 is the direct basis for the cost decision, and no other procedural article governs the withdrawal itself explicitly cited in the dispositive other than the general procedure note (which is often Art. 108 LTF), we focus on the explicit cost ruling.

Art. 66 al. 2 LTF

No judicial costs were assessed in the order following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

6B_847/2013

Ordonnance du 8 octobre 2013

Cour de droit pénal

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Schneider, Juge unique.

Greffière: Mme Gehring.

Participants à la procédure

X.________,

représenté par Me Philippe Liechti, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Ministère public central du canton de Vaud , Avenue de Longemalle 1, 1020 Renens VD,

intimé.

Objet

Infraction à la loi fédérale sur les loteries et les paris professionnels, conduite en état d'ébriété qualifiée, arbitraire, violation du droit d'être entendu,

recours contre le jugement de la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 11 juin 2013.

Considérant:

Par écriture du 3 octobre 2013, le recourant déclare retirer purement et simplement le recours qu'il a interjeté contre le jugement rendu le 11 juin 2013 par la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et l'affaire 6B_847/2013 est rayée du rôle.

2. Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Cour d'appel pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 8 octobre 2013

Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique: Schneider

La Greffière: Gehring