Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6B_790/2010 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of criminal-law appeal against confiscation order after appellants abandon challenge; case struck from roll, no costs imposed under Article 32 LTF.

Geschäftsnummer 6B_790/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court struck the case from the roll and ordered no court costs, as the appellants withdrew their appeal. The appellants had sought to overturn a judgment of the Cantonal Criminal Court of Ticino concerning confiscation, filing both a criminal-law appeal and a subsidiary constitutional appeal. The withdrawal was accepted, and the case was dismissed as moot pursuant to Article 32(1)-(2) LTF, with the court exercising its discretion under Article 66(2) LTF to waive judicial fees. The prior cantonal judgment remains in force.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF; Withdrawal of criminal-law appeal against confiscation order after appellants abandon challenge; case struck from roll, no costs imposed under Article 32 LTF: The appellants had sought to overturn a judgment of the Cantonal Criminal Court of Ticino concerning confiscation, filing both a criminal-law appeal and a subsidiary constitutional appeal. The withdrawal was accepted, and the case was dismissed as moot pursuant to Article 32(1)-(2) LTF, with the court exercising its discretion under Article 66(2) LTF to waive judicial fees. The prior cantonal judgment remains in force.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
strafrechtliche Einziehung Prozessrecht Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Wegnahmerecht Besitzesrechtsklage Pfändung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC
Procedural rule applied in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to decide on court costs.
Art. 71 LTF
Procedural rule applied in conjunction with Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC to decide on court costs.
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF
Basis for waiving court costs in case of withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF
Procedural basis for striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
6B_1347/2023
Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Confiscation Decision
6B_1054/2013
Federal Supreme Court Criminal Appeal Withdrawal
1B_139/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Confiscation Order
6B_709/2012
Withdrawal of Confiscation Appeal
2C_16/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Weapon Seizure and Permit

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF

Procedural basis for striking the case from the roll following withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC

Procedural rule applied in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to decide on court costs.

Art. 71 LTF

Procedural rule applied in conjunction with Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC to decide on court costs.

Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF

Basis for waiving court costs in case of withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

6B_790/2010

Decreto del 26 agosto 2011

Corte di diritto penale

Composizione

Giudice federale, Schneider, Giudice unico,

Cancelliera Ortolano Ribordy.

Partecipanti al procedimento

1. A.________,

2. B.________,

entrambi patrocinati dall'avv. Luigi Mattei e dall'avv. Alessia Dolci,

ricorrenti,

contro

1. Ministero pubblico del Cantone Ticino, Palazzo di giustizia, via Pretorio 16, 6901 Lugano,

2. C.________, patrocinato dall'avv. Rossano Pinna,

3. D.________, patrocinato dall'avv. Emanuele Stauffer,

4. E.________, patrocinato dall'avv. Francesca Lanz,

5. F.________ SpA, patrocinata dall'avv. Mario Postizzi,

6. G.________, patrocinato dall'avv. John Noseda,

opponenti.

Oggetto

Confisca,

ricorso in materia penale e ricorso sussidiario in

materia costituzionale contro la sentenza emanata

il 18 giugno 2010 dalla Corte delle assise criminali

del Cantone Ticino.

Considerando:

che con ricorso in materia penale e ricorso sussidiario in materia costituzionale del 14 settembre 2010 A.________ e B.________ hanno impugnato dinanzi al Tribunale federale la sentenza emanata il 18 giugno 2010 dalla Corte delle assise criminali del Cantone Ticino, postulandone l'annullamento;

che con lettera del 23 agosto 2011 A.________ e B.________ hanno comunicato al Tribunale federale di ritirare il loro gravame;

che il presidente o il giudice dell'istruzione della Corte decide quale giudice unico circa lo stralcio dal ruolo delle cause ritirate ( art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF ) e, in tale ambito, statuisce sulle spese giudiziarie ( art. 5 cpv. 2 PC in relazione con l' art. 71 LTF );

che, in caso di desistenza, il Tribunale federale può rinunciare in tutto o in parte a riscuotere le spese giudiziarie ( art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF );

che nella fattispecie si può rinunciare a prelevare spese processuali;

per questi motivi, il Giudice unico decreta:

1. La causa 6B_790/2010 è stralciata dai ruoli a seguito del ritiro del ricorso.

2. Non si prelevano spese giudiziarie.

3. Comunicazione ai patrocinatori delle parti, al Ministero pubblico e alla Corte delle assise criminali del Cantone Ticino.

Losanna, 26 agosto 2011

In nome della Corte di diritto penale

del Tribunale federale svizzero

Il Giudice unico: Schneider

La Cancelliera: Ortolano Ribordy