Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6B_472/2013 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Road Traffic Violation Case

Geschäftsnummer 6B_472/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In this case, an individual appealed against a judgment made by the Cantonal Criminal Court concerning a violation of traffic rules, alleging a breach of legal principles such as in dubio pro reo and citing arbitrariness in the decision. However, the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal on July 2, 2013, after which the Federal Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal and closed the case without imposing any judicial costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Road Traffic Violation Case: However, the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal on July 2, 2013, after which the Federal Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal and closed the case without imposing any judicial costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Normenkontrolle Willkürverbot Grundsatz in dubio pro reo Vollstreckungsverwirkung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
The court ordered the case to be struck from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the decision states that no judicial costs will be levied, which is covered by the general rules on costs, but since the dispositive only states 'Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires' without citing a specific article for this non-levy, and the only cited article is Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, I must strictly adhere to the rule: only include provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive. Since no cost article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3), I will only include the procedural article cited in order 1.
KI-generiert
6B_219/2016
Withdrawal of Traffic Violation Appeal
6B_746/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Traffic Violation Case.
6B_413/2014
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Traffic Violation
6B_1140/2013
Withdrawal in Traffic Violation Appeal
6B_525/2016
Withdrawal of Federal Appeal in Road Traffic Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

The court ordered the case to be struck from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive, the decision states that no judicial costs will be levied, which is covered by the general rules on costs, but since the dispositive only states 'Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires' without citing a specific article for this non-levy, and the only cited article is Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, I must strictly adhere to the rule: only include provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive. Since no cost article is explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3), I will only include the procedural article cited in order 1.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

6B_472/2013

Ordonnance du 5 juillet 2013

Cour de droit pénal

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Schneider, Juge unique.

Greffière: Mme Gehring.

Participants à la procédure

X.________ , représenté par Me Tania Ferreira, avocate,

recourant,

contre

Ministère public de la République et canton de Neuchâtel , rue du Pommier 3, 2000 Neuchâtel,

intimé.

Objet

Violation des règles de la circulation routière, violation du principe in dubio pro reo, arbitraire,

recours contre le jugement de la Cour pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Neuchâtel du 12 avril 2013.

Considérant:

que, par acte du 2 juillet 2013, le recourant a déclaré retirer le recours qu'il a interjeté au Tribunal fédéral contre le jugement d'appel rendu le 12 avril 2013 par la Cour pénale du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel,

qu'il sied d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 32 al. 2 LTF ), sans frais.

Par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et l'affaire 6B_472/2013 est rayée du rôle.

2. Il n'est pas prélevé de frais judiciaires.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Cour pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Neuchâtel.

Lausanne, le 5 juillet 2013

Au nom de la Cour de droit pénal

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique: Schneider

La Greffière: Gehring