Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6B_1074/2013 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Conservatory Seizure

Geschäftsnummer 6B_1074/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

In a case before the Swiss Federal Tribunal, the appellant, having initially filed a criminal appeal against a decision made by the Vice President of the Court of Appeal and Review of the Canton of Ticino, submitted a letter stating the withdrawal of the appeal as it had become moot. The court addressed the procedural aspects surrounding the withdrawal, including the authority to remove the case from the docket and the consideration of any court fees associated with the appeal. Ultimately, the case was stricken from the court's roles, and no judicial costs were imposed as a result of the withdrawal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Conservatory Seizure: The court addressed the procedural aspects surrounding the withdrawal, including the authority to remove the case from the docket and the consideration of any court fees associated with the appeal. Ultimately, the case was stricken from the court's roles, and no judicial costs were imposed as a result of the withdrawal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abschiebung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens kostenloses Verfahren Beschlagnahme von Beweismitteln Trennungsklage Ausschluss der öffentlichen Verhandlung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF
The case was struck from the roll because the appeal was withdrawn, as explicitly mentioned in the title and the first order.
Art. 5 cpv. 2 PC
1 e 2 LTF ) e, in tale ambito, statuisce sulle spese giudiziarie ( art. 5 cpv. 2 PC in relazione con l' art.
Art. 71 LTF
2 PC in relazione con l' art. 71 LTF );
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for the decision not to levy judicial costs following the withdrawal.
KI-generiert
5A_616/2023
Federal Supreme Court Dismisses Seizure Appeal After Withdrawal
5A_848/2008
Federal Supreme Court Decision on Withdrawal of Appeal Against Seizure Proceedings
5A_78/2009
Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal in Seizure Matter
5A_406/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Seizure Proceedings
1B_125/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Seizure Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF

The case was struck from the roll because the appeal was withdrawn, as explicitly mentioned in the title and the first order.

art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for the decision not to levy judicial costs following the withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

6B_1074/2013

Decreto del 27 novembre 2013

Corte di diritto penale

Composizione

Giudice federale Schneider, Giudice unico,

Cancelliera Ortolano Ribordy.

Partecipanti al procedimento

A.________,

patrocinato dall'avv. Filippo Ferrari,

ricorrente,

contro

Ministero pubblico del Cantone Ticino , Palazzo di giustizia, via Pretorio 16, 6901 Lugano,

opponente.

Oggetto

Sequestro conservativo; ritiro del ricorso ( art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF ),

ricorso in materia penale contro la sentenza emanata

l'8 ottobre 2013 dal Vicepresidente della Corte di appello e di revisione penale del Cantone Ticino.

Considerando:

che con lettera del 22 novembre 2013 A.________ ha dichiarato ritirare il ricorso in materia penale interposto contro la sentenza resa l'8 ottobre 2013 dal Vicepresidente della Corte di appello e di revisione penale, in quanto divenuto privo di oggetto, chiedendo al Tribunale federale lo stralcio dal ruolo della causa;

che il presidente o il giudice dell'istruzione della Corte decide quale giudice unico circa lo stralcio dal ruolo delle cause ritirate ( art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF ) e, in tale ambito, statuisce sulle spese giudiziarie ( art. 5 cpv. 2 PC in relazione con l' art. 71 LTF );

che, in caso di desistenza, il Tribunale federale può rinunciare in tutto o in parte a riscuotere le spese giudiziarie ( art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF );

che nella fattispecie si può rinunciare a prelevare spese processuali;

per questi motivi, il Giudice unico decreta:

1. La causa è stralciata dai ruoli a seguito del ritiro del ricorso.

2. Non si prelevano spese giudiziarie.

3. Comunicazione alle parti e alla Corte di appello e di revisione penale del Cantone Ticino.

Losanna, 27 novembre 2013

In nome della Corte di diritto penale

del Tribunale federale svizzero

Il Giudice unico: Schneider

La Cancelliera: Ortolano Ribordy