Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5D_9/2008 KI-generiert

Debt enforcement opposition: withdrawal of constitutional appeal against rejection of definitive opposition to enforcement notice; costs borne by withdrawing appellant under Article 66(3) LTF.

Geschäftsnummer 5D_9/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Swiss Federal Tribunal struck the case from the roll and ordered the appellant to pay CHF 200 in court costs, effectively upholding the prior decisions below. The appellant had withdrawn his constitutional-law appeal challenging a decision of the Ticino Court of Appeal's civil cassation chamber, which had declared inadmissible his challenge to a district judge’s order definitively rejecting his opposition to a debt enforcement notice (precetto esecutivo) issued by the Municipality of Lugano. The Court based its ruling on Article 32(1) and (2) of the Federal Tribunal Act (LTF), governing procedural withdrawal of a case, and Article 66(3) LTF, which assigns the losing party the burden of unnecessary costs caused by the withdrawal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 cpv. 1 LTF, Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF; Debt enforcement opposition: withdrawal of constitutional appeal against rejection of definitive opposition to enforcement notice; costs borne by withdrawing appellant under Article 66(3) LTF: The appellant had withdrawn his constitutional-law appeal challenging a decision of the Ticino Court of Appeal's civil cassation chamber, which had declared inadmissible his challenge to a district judge’s order definitively rejecting his opposition to a debt enforcement notice (precetto esecutivo) issued by the Municipality of Lugano. The Court based its ruling on Article 32(1) and (2) of the Federal Tribunal Act (LTF), governing procedural withdrawal of a case, and Article 66(3) LTF, which assigns the losing party the burden of unnecessary costs caused by the withdrawal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückzug des Betreibungsbegehrens Vollstreckungsverfahren unnötige Kosten Zahlungsbefehl ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen Vorladung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 cpv. 1 LTF
Procedural basis for the president to direct the proceeding and decide on withdrawal as sole judge.
Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF
Procedural basis for the instruction judge to order the striking of withdrawn cases from the roll.
Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF
Costs provision applied to charge the appellant with the court costs caused by the withdrawal.
KI-generiert
5D_97/2008
Withdrawal of Constitutional Complaint Regarding Debt Enforcement
5D_1/2007
Federal Court Confirms Withdrawal of Constitutional Complaint in Debt Collection Proceedings.
5D_28/2008
Constitutional Complaint Withdrawal in Debt Collection Legal Assistance Case
5D_176/2009
Withdrawal of Constitutional Complaint in Debt Enforcement Annulment Case
5D_96/2007
Petitioner's Withdrawal of Constitutional Complaint Regarding Debt Enforcement Renders Proceedings Settled and Imposes Costs on Petitioner

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 32 cpv. 1 LTF

Procedural basis for the president to direct the proceeding and decide on withdrawal as sole judge.

Art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF

Procedural basis for the instruction judge to order the striking of withdrawn cases from the roll.

Art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF

Costs provision applied to charge the appellant with the court costs caused by the withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5D_9/2008

Decreto del 5 marzo 2008

II Corte di diritto civile

Composizione

Giudice federale Raselli, Presidente,

cancelliere Piatti.

Parti

A.________,

ricorrente,

contro

Comune di Lugano, via della Posta 8, 6900 Lugano,

opponente, rappresentato dal suo Municipio,

palazzo Civico, piazza Riforma 1, 6900 Lugano.

Oggetto

rigetto definitivo dell'opposizione,

ricorso in materia costituzionale contro la sentenza emanata il 14 dicembre 2007 dalla Camera di cassazione civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino.

Considerando:

che il 18 gennaio 2008 A.________ ha impugnato innanzi al Tribunale federale la sentenza 14 dicembre 2007, con cui la Camera di cassazione civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino ha dichiarato inammissibile il rimedio proposto contro la decisione del Pretore del distretto di Lugano di rigettare l'opposizione interposta dal ricorrente a un precetto esecutivo fatto notificare dal Comune di Lugano;

- con scritto 3 marzo 2008 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare il ricorso;

che giusta l' art. 32 cpv. 1 LTF il presidente della Corte dirige il procedimento quale giudice dell'istruzione fino alla pronuncia della sentenza e che in virtù dell' art. 32 cpv. 2 LTF il giudice dell'istruzione decide quale giudice unico lo stralcio dal ruolo delle cause ritirate;

che le spese inutili sono pagate da chi le causa ( art. 66 cpv. 3 LTF );

per questi motivi, il Presidente decreta:

1. La causa è stralciata dai ruoli a seguito del ritiro del ricorso.

2. Le spese giudiziarie di fr. 200.-- sono poste a carico del ricorrente.

3. Comunicazione alle parti e alla Camera di cassazione civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino.

Losanna, 5 marzo 2008

In nome della II Corte di diritto civile

del Tribunale federale svizzero

Il Presidente: Il Cancelliere:

Raselli Piatti