Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_873/2009 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Marital Protective Measures and Allocation of Costs

Geschäftsnummer 5A_873/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved a civil appeal related to protective measures for a marital union, where the appellant filed a civil complaint against a decision made by a lower court. Subsequently, the appellant submitted a declaration to withdraw the appeal, which prompted the tribunal to take note of this withdrawal and remove the case from its agenda. The tribunal also determined that the costs associated with the judicial proceedings should be borne by the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 5 al. 2 PCF, Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Marital Protective Measures and Allocation of Costs: Subsequently, the appellant submitted a declaration to withdraw the appeal, which prompted the tribunal to take note of this withdrawal and remove the case from its agenda. The tribunal also determined that the costs associated with the judicial proceedings should be borne by the appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zivilprozessordnung Verfahrenskosten eheliche Gemeinschaft Eheschutzverfahren Rückzug der Scheidungsklage Prozessrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to justify taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal and striking the case from the roll.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited as the procedural link transferring provisions of the former Code of Civil Procedure (PCF) to the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the reasoning, but explicitly mentioned in the consideration leading to the order regarding the withdrawal, although not directly in the dispositive numbers 1-3, it describes the effect of the withdrawal recognized in order 1. Based on the strict rule to only include articles explicitly cited in the numbered orders (dispositive), this article is excluded unless it appeared in orders 1, 2, or 3, which it does not.
Art. 5 al. 2 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF regarding the allocation of costs.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
Not cited in the final orders.
Art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to bear the judicial costs in order 2.
KI-generiert
5A_433/2008
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protective Measures Case and Cost Allocation
5A_138/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protective Measures Dispute
5A_252/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Protective Measures for Marital Union
5A_576/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal and Costs in Marital Dispute Proceedings
5A_216/2021
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Protective Measures in Marriage

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Not cited in the final orders.

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the reasoning, but explicitly mentioned in the consideration leading to the order regarding the withdrawal, although not directly in the dispositive numbers 1-3, it describes the effect of the withdrawal recognized in order 1. Based on the strict rule to only include articles explicitly cited in the numbered orders (dispositive), this article is excluded unless it appeared in orders 1, 2, or 3, which it does not.

Art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to bear the judicial costs in order 2.

Art. 71 LTF

Cited as the procedural link transferring provisions of the former Code of Civil Procedure (PCF) to the Federal Supreme Court proceedings.

Art. 5 al. 2 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF regarding the allocation of costs.

Art. 73 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to justify taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal and striking the case from the roll.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_873/2009

Ordonnance du 27 janvier 2010

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffier: M. Fellay.

Parties

X.________,

représenté par Me Alexandre de Gorski, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Y.________,

intimée.

Objet

mesures protectrices de l'union conjugale,

recours contre l'arrêt de la Chambre civile de la Cour de justice du canton de Genève du 13 novembre 2009.

Vu:

le recours en matière civile du 28 décembre 2009;

les ordonnances présidentielles des 29 décembre 2009 et 22 janvier 2010, invitant le recourant à verser une avance de frais de 2'000 fr.;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 22 janvier 2010.

Considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que les frais doivent être mis à la charge du recourant ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF ).

Par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et la cause est rayée du rôle.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 300 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Chambre civile de la Cour de justice du canton de Genève.

Lausanne, le 27 janvier 2010

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: Le Greffier:

Hohl Fellay