Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_833/2014 KI-generiert

Federal Tribunal Decision on Withdrawal of Attachment Validation Appeal

Geschäftsnummer 5A_833/2014
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a civil appeal regarding the validation of a seizure, following a decision made by the supervisory chamber of the cantonal court concerning enforcement offices in Geneva. The parties include a claimant contesting the seizure and an enforcement office as the respondent. The appeal reached the Swiss Federal Tribunal, which noted a request for a suspensive effect alongside the appeal. However, the claimant subsequently withdrew the appeal, leading the tribunal to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and remove the case from its docket. Additionally, the tribunal stipulated that the claimant would incur a judicial fee as a consequence of the proceedings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 5 al. 2 PCF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Federal Tribunal Decision on Withdrawal of Attachment Validation Appeal: The parties include a claimant contesting the seizure and an enforcement office as the respondent. The appeal reached the Swiss Federal Tribunal, which noted a request for a suspensive effect alongside the appeal. However, the claimant subsequently withdrew the appeal, leading the tribunal to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and remove the case from its docket. Additionally, the tribunal stipulated that the claimant would incur a judicial fee as a consequence of the proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arrestprosequierung Arrestvollzug Urteile zur Prüfung der Gültigkeit Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens begründeter Entscheid E-Justice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 PCF
Cited in the reasoning concerning the main ground for striking the case from the roll following withdrawal, through reference to Art. 71 LTF.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as the means by which the applicable procedural law (PCF) is invoked for striking the case from the roll.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 5 al. 2 PCF
Cited in the reasoning regarding the imposition of judicial costs on the appellant, through reference to Art. 71 LTF.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive item 2 and the preceding reasoning as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the appellant.
KI-generiert
5A_791/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Decision
5A_552/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Notice of Attachment (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
5A_379/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Notice
5A_67/2013
Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Allocation in Geneva Attachment Case
5A_290/2025
Attachment Order Appeal Withdrawn

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive item 2 and the preceding reasoning as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the appellant.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as the means by which the applicable procedural law (PCF) is invoked for striking the case from the roll.

art. 5 al. 2 PCF

Cited in the reasoning regarding the imposition of judicial costs on the appellant, through reference to Art. 71 LTF.

art. 73 PCF

Cited in the reasoning concerning the main ground for striking the case from the roll following withdrawal, through reference to Art. 71 LTF.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_833/2014

Ordonnance du 30 octobre 2014

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral von Werdt, Président.

Greffière : Mme de Poret Bortolaso.

Participants à la procédure

A.________,

représentée par Me Anne Sonnex Kyd, avocate,

recourante,

contre

B.________,

intimée,

Office des poursuites de Genève , rue du Stand 46, 1204 Genève.

Objet

validation du séquestre,

recours contre la décision de la Cour de justice du canton de Genève, Chambre de surveillance des Offices des poursuites et faillites, du 9 octobre 2014.

Vu :

le recours en matière civile du 24 octobre 2014 et la requête d'effet suspensif qu'il contient;

l'ordonnance présidentielle du 27 octobre 2014 invitant les participants à la procédure et l'autorité intimée à se déterminer sur dite requête;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 29 octobre 2014;

considérant :

qu'il y a lieu de prendre acte du retrait du recours et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que la requête d'effet suspensif présentée par la recourante et l'ordonnance présidentielle du 27 octobre 2014 deviennent sans objet;

que l'émolument judiciaire incombe à la recourante ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, le Président ordonne :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Un émolument judiciaire de 300 fr. est mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, à l'Office des poursuites de Genève et à la Cour de justice du canton de Genève, Chambre de surveillance des Offices des poursuites et faillites.

Lausanne, le 30 octobre 2014

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président : von Werdt

La Greffière : de Poret Bortolaso