Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_753/2008 KI-generiert

Debt collection appeal inadmissible for lack of reasoning under Article 42 LTF.

Geschäftsnummer 5A_753/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court declared the appeal inadmissible, ruling against the appellant and ordering it to pay court costs of 1,200 Swiss francs. The case concerned a challenge to a lower court’s decision (Cantonal Court of Vaud, dated 7 October 2008) in a debt collection matter involving the definitive lifting of an opposition (mainlevée définitive de l'opposition). The appeal was dismissed because, although filed within the statutory deadline under Article 100(1) of the Federal Supreme Court Act (LTF), it lacked any substantive legal reasoning as required by Article 42 LTF. The deadline for filing a supplementary memorandum had expired and could not be extended under Article 47(1) LTF, so the court rejected the request for additional time and disposed of the case under the simplified procedure of Article 108(1) LTF. The lower court’s decision therefore remains in force.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 42 LTF, Art. 47 al. 1 LTF, Art. 108 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Debt collection appeal inadmissible for lack of reasoning under Article 42 LTF: The case concerned a challenge to a lower court’s decision (Cantonal Court of Vaud, dated 7 October 2008) in a debt collection matter involving the definitive lifting of an opposition (mainlevée définitive de l'opposition). The appeal was dismissed because, although filed within the statutory deadline under Article 100(1) of the Federal Supreme Court Act (LTF), it lacked any substantive legal reasoning as required by Article 42 LTF. The deadline for filing a supplementary memorandum had expired and could not be extended under Article 47(1) LTF, so the court rejected the request for additional time and disposed of the case under the simplified procedure of Article 108(1) LTF. The lower court’s decision therefore remains in force.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rechtsvorschlag gesetzliche Voraussetzungen Vollstreckungsverfahren Beschwerdelegitimation vereinfachtes Verfahren Leitverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
Basis for the appeal’s timeliness, which was met but failed due to lack of motivation.
Art. 42 LTF
Requirement for the appeal to contain a motivation, which was absent, leading to inadmissibility.
Art. 47 al. 1 LTF
Prohibition against extending the appeal deadline, preventing a supplementary memorandum.
Art. 108 al. 1 LTF
Procedural basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible in simplified proceedings.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposition of judicial costs on the appellant.
KI-generiert
5D_177/2015
Debt Enforcement Opposition Appeal Inadmissibility
4A_259/2025
Debtor's Appeal Inadmissibility in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
5A_91/2012
Debt Enforcement Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Motivation
5D_217/2015
Appeal on Debt Enforcement Inadmissibility Dismissed
5D_84/2018
Inadmissibility of Constitutional Appeal in Debt Enforcement Matter

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF

Basis for the appeal’s timeliness, which was met but failed due to lack of motivation.

Art. 42 LTF

Requirement for the appeal to contain a motivation, which was absent, leading to inadmissibility.

Art. 47 al. 1 LTF

Prohibition against extending the appeal deadline, preventing a supplementary memorandum.

Art. 108 al. 1 LTF

Procedural basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible in simplified proceedings.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposition of judicial costs on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_753/2008 / frs

Arrêt du 17 novembre 2008

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

M. le Juge Raselli, Président.

Greffier: M. Fellay.

Parties

X.________,

recourant,

contre

Y.________ et Commune de Z.________,

intimés,

Objet

mainlevée définitive de l'opposition,

recours contre l'arrêt de la Cour des poursuites

et faillites du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud

du 7 octobre 2008.

Considérant:

qu'un recours au Tribunal fédéral doit être déposé dans le délai ( art. 100 al. 1 LTF ) et la forme ( art. 42 LTF ) prévus par la loi;

qu'en l'espèce, le recours a certes été déposé dans le délai légal, mais il ne contient aucune motivation;

que le délai de l' art. 100 al. 1 LTF étant échu et ne pouvant être prolongé ( art. 47 al. 1 LTF ), il n'y a pas lieu de fixer au recourant, comme il le demande, un délai pour présenter un mémoire complémentaire;

que le recours doit par conséquent être déclaré irrecevable en procédure simplifiée ( art. 108 al. 1 LTF ), aux frais de son auteur ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, le Président prononce:

1. Le recours est irrecevable.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 1'200 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. Le présent arrêt est communiqué aux parties et à la Cour des poursuites et faillites du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 17 novembre 2008

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président: Le Greffier:

Raselli Fellay