Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_576/2011 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal and Costs in Marital Dispute Proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 5A_576/2011
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a civil appeal regarding protective measures for a marital union, where one party filed a recourse against a decision made by a delegate judge in a cantonal court. The appeal was submitted along with a request for legal aid. However, before any substantive ruling could be made, the party that initiated the appeal withdrew it. As a result, the court acknowledged this withdrawal, dismissed the case, and indicated that the judicial costs would be borne by the party who withdrew their appeal. The request for legal assistance was rendered moot due to the withdrawal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 5 al. 2 PCF, art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF, art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal and Costs in Marital Dispute Proceedings: The appeal was submitted along with a request for legal aid. However, before any substantive ruling could be made, the party that initiated the appeal withdrew it. As a result, the court acknowledged this withdrawal, dismissed the case, and indicated that the judicial costs would be borne by the party who withdrew their appeal. The request for legal assistance was rendered moot due to the withdrawal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Entzug der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege Verfahrenskosten Zivilrechtsstreitigkeit Verfahrensvorschriften eheliche Gemeinschaft Eheschutzverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 73 PCF
Cited alongside Art. 71 LTF in relation to taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited as the regulatory basis for applying procedural rules concerning withdrawal in the context of the appeal.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited to establish the competency of the instructing judge to issue the decision regarding withdrawal.
Art. 5 al. 2 PCF
Cited alongside Art. 71 LTF as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the withdrawing party.
art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for ordering the withdrawing party to pay the judicial costs.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive (point 2) as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the appellant.
KI-generiert
5A_466/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protection Case
5A_873/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Marital Protective Measures and Allocation of Costs
5A_491/2010
Federal Tribunal Appeal on Marital Maintenance Withdrawn
5A_138/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protective Measures Dispute
5A_746/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Provisional Marital Measures

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited to establish the competency of the instructing judge to issue the decision regarding withdrawal.

art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for ordering the withdrawing party to pay the judicial costs.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive (point 2) as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the appellant.

art. 71 LTF

Cited as the regulatory basis for applying procedural rules concerning withdrawal in the context of the appeal.

art. 5 al. 2 PCF

Cited alongside Art. 71 LTF as the basis for imposing judicial costs on the withdrawing party.

art. 73 PCF

Cited alongside Art. 71 LTF in relation to taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_576/2011

Ordonnance du 27 octobre 2011

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

M. le Juge Herrmann, en qualité de juge instructeur.

Greffière: Mme Mairot.

Participants à la procédure

dame A.________,

représentée par Me Philippe Girod, avocat,

recourante,

contre

A.________,

représenté par Françoise Trümpy-Waridel,

avocate,

intimé.

Objet

mesures protectrices de l'union conjugale,

recours contre l'arrêt du Juge délégué de la Cour d'appel civile du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 28 juillet 2011.

Vu:

le recours en matière civile du 1er septembre 2011, assorti d'une demande d'assistance judiciaire;

l'ordonnance présidentielle du 2 septembre 2011, différant la décision concernant l'assistance judiciaire;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 26 octobre 2011;

considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF );

que le juge instructeur est compétent pour statuer à cet effet ( art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que la demande d'assistance judiciaire de la recourante est ainsi devenue sans objet;

que les frais judiciaires incombent à la partie qui retire son recours ( art. 5 al. 2 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF );

qu'il n'y a pas lieu d'allouer de dépens, des observations n'ayant pas été requises;

par ces motifs, le Juge instructeur ordonne:

1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et la cause est rayée du rôle.

2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 300 fr., sont mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Juge délégué de la Cour d'appel civile du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 27 octobre 2011

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge instructeur: Herrmann

La Greffière: Mairot