Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_517/2010 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Protective Measures in Marital Union

Geschäftsnummer 5A_517/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a legal dispute regarding protective measures for a marriage, where one party appealed a decision made by the Cantonal Court of Vaud. Subsequently, the appellant submitted a withdrawal of their appeal, leading to the Swiss Federal Tribunal formally acknowledging this withdrawal and removing the case from its agenda. The appellant was also ordered to pay a judicial fee.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 73 PCF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Concerning Protective Measures in Marital Union: Subsequently, the appellant submitted a withdrawal of their appeal, leading to the Swiss Federal Tribunal formally acknowledging this withdrawal and removing the case from its agenda. The appellant was also ordered to pay a judicial fee.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
eheliche Gemeinschaft Urteilsdispositiv prozessleitende Verfügungen Eheschutzverfahren Prozessrecht Rückzug der Scheidungsklage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal, which precedes the operative part, but the actual order (point 1) relies on Art. 73 PCF/Art. 71 LTF for striking the roll.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited in the operative part (point 1) together with Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal.
Art. 73 PCF
Cited in the operative part (point 1) along with Art. 71 LTF to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Used in the operative part (point 2) to order the appellant to bear the judicial costs.
KI-generiert
5A_466/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protection Case
5A_216/2021
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Protective Measures in Marriage
5A_138/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal in Marital Protective Measures Dispute
5A_873/2009
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Marital Protective Measures and Allocation of Costs
5A_229/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Marital Protection Case Following Settlement

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for taking note of the withdrawal, which precedes the operative part, but the actual order (point 1) relies on Art. 73 PCF/Art. 71 LTF for striking the roll.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used in the operative part (point 2) to order the appellant to bear the judicial costs.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in the operative part (point 1) together with Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following withdrawal.

art. 73 PCF

Cited in the operative part (point 1) along with Art. 71 LTF to order the striking of the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_517/2010

Ordonnance du 26 juillet 2010

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffière: Mme de Poret Bortolaso.

Participants à la procédure

A.________, (époux),

recourant,

contre

dame A.________, (épouse),

représentée par Me Isabelle Jaques, avocate,

intimée.

Objet

mesures protectrices de l'union conjugale,

recours contre le jugement de la Chambre des recours du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 1er juin 2010.

Vu:

l'acte de recours du 9 juillet 2010;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 23 juillet 2010;

les art. 32 al. 2 LTF et 73 PCF en relation avec l' art. 71 LTF ;

considérant:

qu'il y a lieu de prendre acte du retrait du recours et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que l'émolument judiciaire incombe au recourant ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Un émolument judiciaire de 300 fr. est mis à la charge du recourant.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Chambre des recours du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 26 juillet 2010

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: La Greffière:

Hohl de Poret Bortolaso