Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_379/2010 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Notice

Geschäftsnummer 5A_379/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a challenge to a seizure notice issued by the Office of Debt Enforcement in Geneva. The appellant filed a formal appeal against a decision from the Commission for the Surveillance of Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Offices in Geneva dated April 29, 2010. However, the appellant later chose to withdraw the appeal on June 11, 2010. The court acknowledged this withdrawal and decided to remove the case from its docket while also imposing a judicial fee on the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 73 PCF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Notice: The appellant filed a formal appeal against a decision from the Commission for the Surveillance of Debt Collection and Bankruptcy Offices in Geneva dated April 29, 2010. However, the appellant later chose to withdraw the appeal on June 11, 2010. The court acknowledged this withdrawal and decided to remove the case from its docket while also imposing a judicial fee on the appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Pfändungsankündigung Rückzug des Betreibungsbegehrens Vollstreckungsentscheid Verstrickungsbruch Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung Entfernungsmassnahme im Ausländerrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
The case was struck off the roll because the appellant withdrew the appeal, as indicated in the first order.
Art. 71 LTF
This article is cited in reference to Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.
Art. 73 PCF
This provision is cited in reference to Art. 71 LTF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is applied to impose judicial costs on the appellant in the second order.
KI-generiert
5A_584/2009
Appeal Against Attachment Notice Struck Due to Withdrawal
5A_552/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Notice of Attachment (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
5A_785/2017
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Enforcement Order and Reduced Court Fees
5A_290/2025
Attachment Order Appeal Withdrawn
5A_791/2024
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

The case was struck off the roll because the appellant withdrew the appeal, as indicated in the first order.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is applied to impose judicial costs on the appellant in the second order.

art. 71 LTF

This article is cited in reference to Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

art. 73 PCF

This provision is cited in reference to Art. 71 LTF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_379/2010

Ordonnance du 17 juin 2010

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffière: Mme de Poret Bortolaso.

Participants à la procédure

X.________,

recourante,

contre

Office des poursuites de Genève, rue du Stand 46, 1204 Genève,

intimé.

Objet

avis de saisie,

recours contre la décision de la Commission de surveillance des offices des poursuites et des faillites

du canton de Genève du 29 avril 2010.

Vu:

l'acte de recours du 10 mai 2010;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 11 juin 2010;

les art. 32 al. 2 LTF et 73 PCF en relation avec l' art. 71 LTF ;

considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que l'émolument judiciaire incombe à la recourante ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Un émolument judiciaire de 300 fr. est mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Commission de surveillance des offices des poursuites et des faillites du canton de Genève.

Lausanne, le 17 juin 2010

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: La Greffière:

Hohl de Poret Bortolaso