Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_34/2010 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Divorce Provisional Measures Case

Geschäftsnummer 5A_34/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a dispute concerning provisional measures related to a divorce, with a party appealing a decision from a civil court made in November 2009. Subsequently, the appellant submitted a request to withdraw the appeal in January 2010, which was formally acknowledged by the Federal Tribunal. The court then decided to strike the case from its docket and imposed a judicial fee on the withdrawing appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 82 let. a LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Divorce Provisional Measures Case: Subsequently, the appellant submitted a request to withdraw the appeal in January 2010, which was formally acknowledged by the Federal Tribunal. The court then decided to strike the case from its docket and imposed a judicial fee on the withdrawing appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
vorsorgliche Massnahmen bei Scheidung Einreichungsdatum Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung Nichtigkeitsverfahren provisorische Rechtsöffnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the considerations but not in the dispositive. In the dispositive, the order explicitly refers to the withdrawal of the appeal and the associated costs.
Art. 71 LTF
2 LTF et 73 PCF en relation avec l' art. 71 LTF ;
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Used in the dispositive (Order 2) to impose judicial costs on the appellant following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 82 let. a LTF
This is not explicitly in the dispositive, but the ruling is based on the withdrawal of the appeal, which often invokes procedural rules like Art. 71 LTF or related concepts. However, strictly based on the final orders (1, 2, 3), only cost provisions are explicitly cited.
KI-generiert
5A_918/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Divorce Provisional Measures Case
5D_105/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal in Divorce Proceeding Interim Measures Case
5A_159/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal in Divorce Proceeding Preliminary Measures Case
5A_512/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal in Provisional Divorce Measures
5A_546/2010
Appeal Withdrawn in Divorce Interim Measures Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the considerations but not in the dispositive. In the dispositive, the order explicitly refers to the withdrawal of the appeal and the associated costs.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used in the dispositive (Order 2) to impose judicial costs on the appellant following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 82 let. a LTF

This is not explicitly in the dispositive, but the ruling is based on the withdrawal of the appeal, which often invokes procedural rules like Art. 71 LTF or related concepts. However, strictly based on the final orders (1, 2, 3), only cost provisions are explicitly cited.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_34/2010

Ordonnance du 19 février 2010

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffière: Mme Aguet.

Parties

dame X.________,

représentée par Me Danièle Mooser, avocate,

recourante,

contre

X.________,

représenté par Me Jean-Claude Morisod, avocat,

intimé.

Objet

mesures provisionnelles (divorce),

recours contre l'arrêt du Tribunal civil de la Glâne du 23 novembre 2009.

La Présidente, vu:

l'acte de recours du 11 janvier 2010;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 14 février 2010;

les art. 32 al. 2 LTF et 73 PCF en relation avec l' art. 71 LTF ;

considérant:

qu'il y a lieu de prendre acte du retrait du recours et de rayer la cause du rôle;

que l'émolument judiciaire incombe à la recourante ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Un émolument judiciaire de 300 fr. est mis à la charge de la recourante.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Tribunal civil de la Glâne.

Lausanne, le 19 février 2010

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: La Greffière:

Hohl Aguet