Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5A_327/2024 KI-generiert

Defense Counsel Fee Assessment and Withdrawal of Appeals

Geschäftsnummer 5A_327/2024
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Defense Counsel Fee Assessment and Withdrawal of Appeals An official defense counsel, whose professional fee was set by the lower court in a case concerning personal relations and child maintenance, filed a complaint against the cantonal decision that had dismissed as inadmissible his appeal against the fee assessment. Subsequently, the counsel withdrew the civil and subsidiary constitutional appeals filed with the Federal Supreme Court and requested that no court costs be charged. The Federal Supreme Court, in its capacity as the sole presiding judge, acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeals, ordered the case to be removed from the court docket, and imposed reduced court costs of CHF 500 on the appellant, reasoning that the expenses should be borne by the party withdrawing the appeal, but reduced due to the early stage of the procedure at the time of withdrawal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 71 LTF, Art. 73 PC, Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF; Defense Counsel Fee Assessment and Withdrawal of Appeals: Subsequently, the counsel withdrew the civil and subsidiary constitutional appeals filed with the Federal Supreme Court and requested that no court costs be charged. The Federal Supreme Court, in its capacity as the sole presiding judge, acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeals, ordered the case to be removed from the court docket, and imposed reduced court costs of CHF 500 on the appellant, reasoning that the expenses should be borne by the party withdrawing the appeal, but reduced due to the early stage of the procedure at the time of withdrawal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Honorar Kostenfestsetzung Verteidigungskosten amtliche Verteidigung Kürzung des Anwaltshonorars Parteientschädigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 71 LTF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PC as the legal basis for striking the case from the role following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 73 PC
71 LTF in relazione con l' art. 73 PC ).
Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF
Cited as the general basis for imposing court fees on the party who withdraws the appeal.
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF
Cited as the basis for reducing the federal court costs due to the stage at which the appeal was withdrawn.
KI-generiert
6B_493/2007
Defense Counsel's Right to Legal Fee Compensation for Appeals
7B_927/2026
Removal from docket following withdrawal of appeal concerning court-appointed defense counsel compensation and costs
4A_180/2018
Petitioner's Withdrawal of Appeal and Assessment of Costs
6B_911/2024
Dismissal of criminal appeal regarding court-appointed defense counsel compensation following formal withdrawal of the appeal.
6B_981/2025
Fees for Court-Appointed Defense Attorney: Arbitrary Reduction of Claimed Hours for Client Contacts, Preparation of Appeal Response and Closing Argument, and Post-Appeal Mandate Te

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for reducing the federal court costs due to the stage at which the appeal was withdrawn.

art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF

Cited as the general basis for imposing court fees on the party who withdraws the appeal.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PC as the legal basis for striking the case from the role following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

5A_327/2024

Decreto del 2 luglio 2024

II Corte di diritto civile

Composizione

Giudice federale Herrmann, Presidente,

Cancelliera Antonini.

Partecipanti al procedimento

A.________,

ricorrente,

contro

Pretura del Distretto di Riviera, 6710 Biasca,

B.________,

Oggetto

remunerazione del patrocinatore d'ufficio (relazioni personali e mantenimento del figlio), ricorso contro la sentenza emanata il 17 aprile 2024 dalla III Camera civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino (13.2024.21).

Ritenuto in fatto e considerando in diritto:

1.

Con sentenza 17 aprile 2024 la III Camera civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino ha dichiarato irricevibile il reclamo presentato dall'avv. A.________ avverso la decisione 27 marzo 2024 con cui il Pretore del Distretto di Riviera aveva tassato la sua nota professionale quale patrocinatore d'ufficio di B.________ in una causa in materia di relazioni personali e mantenimento del figlio.

Con ricorso in materia civile e ricorso sussidiario in materia costituzionale 23 maggio 2024 l'avv. A.________ ha impugnato la sentenza cantonale.

Non sono state chieste determinazioni.

2.

Con scritto 25 giugno 2024 l'avv. A.________ ha dichiarato di ritirare il ricorso in materia civile e il ricorso sussidiario in materia costituzionale, e ha chiesto di prescindere dal prelievo di spese giudiziarie.

Il Presidente della Corte adita, competente in virtù dell'

art. 32 cpv. 1 e 2 LTF

, non può pertanto far altro che prendere atto del ritiro del ricorso e disporre, quale giudice unico, lo stralcio della causa dai ruoli (

art. 71 LTF in relazione con l' art. 73 PC ).

Le spese giudiziarie della sede federale sono poste a carico della parte che ritira il ricorso (v. art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF

; v. decreto 5A_726/2023 del 20 febbraio 2024 consid. 3). Considerato lo stadio della procedura nel quale è avvenuto il ritiro, tali spese possono tuttavia essere ridotte in applicazione dell'

art. 66 cpv. 2 LTF .

Per questi motivi, il Presidente decreta:

1.

La causa è stralciata dai ruoli a seguito del ritiro del ricorso.

2.

Le spese giudiziarie di fr. 500.-- sono poste a carico del ricorrente.

3.

Comunicazione ai partecipanti al procedimento e alla III Camera civile del Tribunale d'appello del Cantone Ticino.

Losanna, 2 luglio 2024

In nome della II Corte di diritto civile del Tribunale federale svizzero

Il Presidente: Herrmann

La Cancelliera: Antonini