5A_233/2010 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Case

Geschäftsnummer 5A_233/2010

Gericht / Behörde Bundesgericht

Rechtsordnung

Schweiz · Bundesgericht (BGer / BGE) (CH)

Entscheiddatum 12.05.2010

Ausgang struck_off

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against a decision related to bankruptcy made by a civil court in a Swiss canton. Subsequently, the appellant submitted a declaration to withdraw the appeal. The tribunal processed this withdrawal, resulting in the closure of the case. Consequently, a judicial fee was imposed on the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 73 PCF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Case: Subsequently, the appellant submitted a declaration to withdraw the appeal. The tribunal processed this withdrawal, resulting in the closure of the case. Consequently, a judicial fee was imposed on the appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

Konkursverfahren Normenkontrolle Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens prozessleitende Verfügungen nachträglicher Rechtsvorschlag Beschwerdelegitimation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Used in order 1 to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal.

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used in order 2 to impose judicial costs on the appellant due to the withdrawal.

KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Case

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Bankruptcy Judgment

Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Proceeding

Withdrawal of Appeal in Bankruptcy Case with Costs Awarded

Appeal Withdrawal in Bankruptcy Case

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert

art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Used in order 1 to formally acknowledge the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Used in order 2 to impose judicial costs on the appellant due to the withdrawal.

art. 71 LTF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 PCF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

art. 73 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF to justify striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal.

Volltext

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

5A_233/2010

Ordonnance du 12 mai 2010

IIe Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.

Greffière: Mme de Poret.

Participants à la procédure

X.________,

recourant,

contre

1e Cour civile du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel, rue du Pommier 1, 2000 Neuchâtel,

intimée.

Objet

Faillite,

recours contre l'arrêt de la 1e Cour civile du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel

du 8 mars 2010.

Vu:

l'acte de recours du 26 mars 2010;

la déclaration de retrait du recours du 5 mai 2010;

les art. 32 al. 2 LTF et 73 PCF en relation avec l' art. 71 LTF ;

considérant:

qu'il convient de prendre acte de ce retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );

que l'émolument judiciaire incombe au recourant ( art. 66 al. 1 LTF );

par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Un émolument judiciaire de 500 fr. est mis à la charge du recourant.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la 1e Cour civile du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel.

Lausanne, le 12 mai 2010

Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La Présidente: La Greffière:

Hohl de Poret